BIKERELIABILITY Reg check
League table/ Generic Cracker/vs Piaggio NRG
Head-to-head · 2005–2025

Data as of: DVSA MOT results to 2025

Generic Cracker vs Piaggio NRG

The Generic Cracker passes its MOT first time more often than the Piaggio NRG: 66.2% vs 65.5%, a 0.7-point lead.

MOT reliability, side by side

first-time pass rate, outright fail rate and tests analysed · 2005–2025
Metric Generic Cracker Piaggio NRG
First-time pass rate 66.2% 65.5%
Outright fail rate 23.6% 27.4%
Vs comparable bikes (age & mileage adjusted) -6.2 pts -6.0 pts
Engine size 49cc 49cc
Rank among all models #4957 of 5428 #4992 of 5428
Median miles at test 7,928 9,874
MOT tests analysed 1,188 40,458
Most common failure lighting and signalling lighting and signalling

First-time outcomes on normal tests, 2005–2025. "Most common failure" is the component group with the most recorded defects on failed tests. Read pass rates against test counts: a smaller sample is noisier. Source: DVSA anonymised MOT results.

"Vs comparable bikes" is the first-time pass rate minus the rate expected for each bike's own mix of age, mileage and test class, in percentage points: positive means better than comparable bikes. How this works.

What fails, side by side

share of each bike's MOT tests that failed on the component · lower is better
Component Generic Cracker Piaggio NRG
Lights & signalling 13.4% 15.0%
Steering & suspension 10.4% 15.5%
Brakes 10.1% 10.2%
Tyres & wheels 5.6% 4.7%
Fuel & exhaust 2.8% 3.8%
Structure & body 1.6% 2.5%

A test that fails on two components counts once in each. Component links go to the bikes most likely to fail on it.

Pass rate by test year

first-time MOT pass rate in each calendar year both bikes were tested
Test year Generic Cracker Piaggio NRG
2011 58.8% 63.9%
2012 62.3% 63.4%
2013 60.7% 64.1%
2014 59.5% 67.4%
2015 73.1% 68.8%
2016 72.6% 68.0%
2017 81.8% 72.0%
2018 68.6% 69.2%

Each year mixes bikes of different ages, so a fleet that is getting older tends to slip.

Pass rate by mileage

first-time MOT pass rate by miles on the clock at test
Mileage Generic Cracker Piaggio NRG
0k-10k miles 66.9% 71.3%
10k-20k miles 65.2% 60.6%
20k-30k miles 65.4% 55.7%

Bands with fewer than 30 tests for either bike are left out.

Generic Cracker vs Piaggio NRG FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Which is more reliable, the Generic Cracker or the Piaggio NRG?

The Generic Cracker passes its MOT first time more often than the Piaggio NRG: 66.2% vs 65.5%, a 0.7-point lead. Adjusted for age, mileage and test class the two are level (-6.2 vs -6.0 points against comparable bikes), so the raw gap is mostly down to how old and how used each fleet is. An MOT checks roadworthiness items, not engine or gearbox internals.

What does the Generic Cracker fail its MOT on most?

Lights & signalling: 13.4% of Generic Cracker MOT tests failed on it, then steering & suspension (10.4%).

What does the Piaggio NRG fail its MOT on most?

Steering & suspension: 15.5% of Piaggio NRG MOT tests failed on it, then lights & signalling (15.0%).

Which holds up better at high mileage, the Generic Cracker or the Piaggio NRG?

At 20k-30k miles the Generic Cracker passes first time more often: 65.4% for the Generic Cracker vs 55.7% for the Piaggio NRG.

See each bike's full report (trend, mileage curve, failure breakdown and rivals) on its own page.