Data as of: DVSA MOT results to 2025
Cagiva Mito-125 vs Gilera Runner
The Gilera Runner passes its MOT first time more often than the Cagiva Mito-125: 70.8% vs 59.3%, a 11.5-point lead.
MOT reliability, side by side
| Metric | Cagiva Mito-125 | Gilera Runner |
|---|---|---|
| First-time pass rate | 59.3% | 70.8% |
| Outright fail rate | 30.3% | 21.5% |
| Vs comparable bikes (age & mileage adjusted) | -10.6 pts | -0.7 pts |
| Engine size | 124cc | 124cc |
| Rank among all models | #5235 of 5428 | #4675 of 5428 |
| Median miles at test | 17,998 | 11,381 |
| MOT tests analysed | 3,203 | 69,850 |
| Most common failure | lighting and signalling | lighting and signalling |
First-time outcomes on normal tests, 2005–2025. "Most common failure" is the component group with the most recorded defects on failed tests. Read pass rates against test counts: a smaller sample is noisier. Source: DVSA anonymised MOT results.
"Vs comparable bikes" is the first-time pass rate minus the rate expected for each bike's own mix of age, mileage and test class, in percentage points: positive means better than comparable bikes. How this works.
What fails, side by side
| Component | Cagiva Mito-125 | Gilera Runner |
|---|---|---|
| Lights & signalling | 21.2% | 12.3% |
| Steering & suspension | 14.4% | 10.6% |
| Brakes | 10.7% | 7.2% |
| Tyres & wheels | 5.3% | 5.1% |
| Structure & body | 5.3% | 2.0% |
| Drive system | 6.2% | 0.0% |
| Fuel & exhaust | 3.0% | 2.6% |
A test that fails on two components counts once in each. Component links go to the bikes most likely to fail on it.
Pass rate by test year
| Test year | Cagiva Mito-125 | Gilera Runner |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 75.0% | 77.2% |
| 2019 | 64.7% | 77.0% |
| 2020 | 63.0% | 75.8% |
| 2021 | 72.7% | 79.1% |
| 2022 | 71.4% | 80.5% |
| 2023 | 83.9% | 81.3% |
| 2024 | 75.0% | 84.0% |
| 2025 | 78.7% | 85.5% |
Each year mixes bikes of different ages, so a fleet that is getting older tends to slip.
Pass rate by mileage
| Mileage | Cagiva Mito-125 | Gilera Runner |
|---|---|---|
| 0k-10k miles | 69.8% | 76.2% |
| 10k-20k miles | 58.1% | 67.5% |
| 20k-30k miles | 56.3% | 65.4% |
| 30k-40k miles | 52.7% | 67.2% |
| 40k-50k miles | 53.7% | 68.1% |
Bands with fewer than 30 tests for either bike are left out.
Cagiva Mito-125 vs Gilera Runner FAQ
Which is more reliable, the Cagiva Mito-125 or the Gilera Runner?
The Gilera Runner passes its MOT first time more often than the Cagiva Mito-125: 70.8% vs 59.3%, a 11.5-point lead. Adjusted for age, mileage and test class, the Gilera Runner still comes out ahead: -10.6 points vs comparable bikes for the Cagiva Mito-125, -0.7 for the Gilera Runner. An MOT checks roadworthiness items, not engine or gearbox internals.
What does the Cagiva Mito-125 fail its MOT on most?
Lights & signalling: 21.2% of Cagiva Mito-125 MOT tests failed on it, then steering & suspension (14.4%).
What does the Gilera Runner fail its MOT on most?
Lights & signalling: 12.3% of Gilera Runner MOT tests failed on it, then steering & suspension (10.6%).
Which holds up better at high mileage, the Cagiva Mito-125 or the Gilera Runner?
At 40k-50k miles the Gilera Runner passes first time more often: 53.7% for the Cagiva Mito-125 vs 68.1% for the Gilera Runner.
See each bike's full report (trend, mileage curve, failure breakdown and rivals) on its own page.