Cagiva Elephant vs Triumph Sprint

The Triumph Sprint passes its MOT first time more often than the Cagiva Elephant: 85.6% vs 85.4%, a 0.2-point lead.

MOT reliability, side by side

first-time pass rate, outright fail rate and tests analysed · 2005–2025

Metric	Cagiva Elephant	Triumph Sprint
First-time pass rate	85.4%	85.6%
Outright fail rate	7.9%	8.8%
Vs comparable bikes (age & mileage adjusted)	+3.9 pts	+1.8 pts
Engine size	900cc	955cc
Median miles at test	33,938	20,615
MOT tests analysed	178	132,827
Most common failure	lighting and signalling	brakes

First-time outcomes on normal tests, 2005–2025. "Most common failure" is the component group with the most recorded defects on failed tests. Read pass rates against test counts: a smaller sample is noisier. Source: DVSA anonymised MOT results.

"Vs comparable bikes" is the first-time pass rate minus the rate expected for each bike's own mix of age, mileage and test class, in percentage points: positive means better than comparable bikes. How this works.

Pass rate by mileage

first-time MOT pass rate by miles on the clock at test

Mileage	Cagiva Elephant	Triumph Sprint
20k-30k miles	78.0%	85.0%
40k-50k miles	87.1%	80.3%

Bands with fewer than 30 tests for either bike are left out.

CAGIVA ELEPHANT 85.4% pass · 178 tests TRIUMPH SPRINT 85.6% pass · 133k tests

See each bike's full report (trend, mileage curve, failure breakdown and rivals) on its own page.