Cagiva Elefant-900 GT vs Triumph Sprint

The Triumph Sprint passes its MOT first time more often than the Cagiva Elefant-900 GT: 85.6% vs 83.0%, a 2.6-point lead.

MOT reliability, side by side

first-time pass rate, outright fail rate and tests analysed · 2005–2025

Metric	Cagiva Elefant-900 GT	Triumph Sprint
First-time pass rate	83.0%	85.6%
Outright fail rate	10.3%	8.8%
Vs comparable bikes (age & mileage adjusted)	-0.1 pts	+1.8 pts
Engine size	904cc	955cc
Rank among all models	#2962 of 5428	#2333 of 5428
Median miles at test	25,973	20,615
MOT tests analysed	300	132,827
Most common failure	lighting and signalling	brakes

First-time outcomes on normal tests, 2005–2025. "Most common failure" is the component group with the most recorded defects on failed tests. Read pass rates against test counts: a smaller sample is noisier. Source: DVSA anonymised MOT results.

"Vs comparable bikes" is the first-time pass rate minus the rate expected for each bike's own mix of age, mileage and test class, in percentage points: positive means better than comparable bikes. How this works.

Pass rate by mileage

first-time MOT pass rate by miles on the clock at test

Mileage	Cagiva Elefant-900 GT	Triumph Sprint
0k-10k miles	91.3%	90.9%
10k-20k miles	87.8%	87.5%
20k-30k miles	84.1%	85.0%
30k-40k miles	78.6%	82.1%
40k-50k miles	73.2%	80.3%

Bands with fewer than 30 tests for either bike are left out.

CAGIVA ELEFANT-900 GT 83.0% pass · 300 tests TRIUMPH SPRINT 85.6% pass · 133k tests

See each bike's full report (trend, mileage curve, failure breakdown and rivals) on its own page.