Data as of: DVSA MOT results to 2025
Cagiva Canyon vs Yamaha FZS600
The Yamaha FZS600 passes its MOT first time more often than the Cagiva Canyon: 82.6% vs 77.9%, a 4.7-point lead.
MOT reliability, side by side
| Metric | Cagiva Canyon | Yamaha FZS600 |
|---|---|---|
| First-time pass rate | 77.9% | 82.6% |
| Outright fail rate | 12.9% | 10.6% |
| Vs comparable bikes (age & mileage adjusted) | -6.4 pts | -0.8 pts |
| Engine size | 497cc | 599cc |
| Rank among all models | #3931 of 5428 | #3052 of 5428 |
| Median miles at test | 17,870 | 21,612 |
| MOT tests analysed | 394 | 136,558 |
| Most common failure | lighting and signalling | brakes |
First-time outcomes on normal tests, 2005–2025. "Most common failure" is the component group with the most recorded defects on failed tests. Read pass rates against test counts: a smaller sample is noisier. Source: DVSA anonymised MOT results.
"Vs comparable bikes" is the first-time pass rate minus the rate expected for each bike's own mix of age, mileage and test class, in percentage points: positive means better than comparable bikes. How this works.
Pass rate by test year
| Test year | Cagiva Canyon | Yamaha FZS600 |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 78.6% | 86.0% |
| 2007 | 82.1% | 84.1% |
| 2008 | 69.7% | 83.4% |
| 2009 | 81.3% | 81.2% |
| 2010 | 70.0% | 82.0% |
Each year mixes bikes of different ages, so a fleet that is getting older tends to slip.
Pass rate by mileage
| Mileage | Cagiva Canyon | Yamaha FZS600 |
|---|---|---|
| 0k-10k miles | 83.5% | 89.6% |
| 10k-20k miles | 74.3% | 85.5% |
| 20k-30k miles | 74.0% | 81.4% |
| 30k-40k miles | 76.7% | 78.7% |
Bands with fewer than 30 tests for either bike are left out.
See each bike's full report (trend, mileage curve, failure breakdown and rivals) on its own page.