Cagiva Canyon vs Suzuki GSF600

The Cagiva Canyon passes its MOT first time more often than the Suzuki GSF600: 77.9% vs 77.3%, a 0.6-point lead.

MOT reliability, side by side

first-time pass rate, outright fail rate and tests analysed · 2005–2025

Metric	Cagiva Canyon	Suzuki GSF600
First-time pass rate	77.9%	77.3%
Outright fail rate	12.9%	14.2%
Vs comparable bikes (age & mileage adjusted)	-6.4 pts	-6.1 pts
Engine size	497cc	599cc
Rank among all models	#3931 of 5428	#4013 of 5428
Median miles at test	17,870	21,080
MOT tests analysed	394	143,023
Most common failure	lighting and signalling	brakes

First-time outcomes on normal tests, 2005–2025. "Most common failure" is the component group with the most recorded defects on failed tests. Read pass rates against test counts: a smaller sample is noisier. Source: DVSA anonymised MOT results.

"Vs comparable bikes" is the first-time pass rate minus the rate expected for each bike's own mix of age, mileage and test class, in percentage points: positive means better than comparable bikes. How this works.

Pass rate by test year

first-time MOT pass rate in each calendar year both bikes were tested

Test year	Cagiva Canyon	Suzuki GSF600
2006	78.6%	81.8%
2007	82.1%	80.0%
2008	69.7%	78.4%
2009	81.3%	75.8%
2010	70.0%	75.8%

Each year mixes bikes of different ages, so a fleet that is getting older tends to slip.

Pass rate by mileage

first-time MOT pass rate by miles on the clock at test

Mileage	Cagiva Canyon	Suzuki GSF600
0k-10k miles	83.5%	86.8%
10k-20k miles	74.3%	80.1%
20k-30k miles	74.0%	75.2%
30k-40k miles	76.7%	71.3%

Bands with fewer than 30 tests for either bike are left out.

CAGIVA CANYON 77.9% pass · 394 tests SUZUKI GSF600 77.3% pass · 143k tests

See each bike's full report (trend, mileage curve, failure breakdown and rivals) on its own page.