Data as of: DVSA MOT results to 2025
Beta Alp 4T-200 vs Honda XR250
The Beta Alp 4T-200 passes its MOT first time more often than the Honda XR250: 81.5% vs 78.8%, a 2.7-point lead.
MOT reliability, side by side
| Metric | Beta Alp 4T-200 | Honda XR250 |
|---|---|---|
| First-time pass rate | 81.5% | 78.8% |
| Outright fail rate | 9.5% | 12.3% |
| Vs comparable bikes (age & mileage adjusted) | +2.8 pts | -6.8 pts |
| Engine size | 199cc | 249cc |
| Rank among all models | #3270 of 5428 | #3805 of 5428 |
| Median miles at test | 3,872 | 8,618 |
| MOT tests analysed | 1,144 | 9,277 |
| Most common failure | lighting and signalling | lighting and signalling |
First-time outcomes on normal tests, 2005–2025. "Most common failure" is the component group with the most recorded defects on failed tests. Read pass rates against test counts: a smaller sample is noisier. Source: DVSA anonymised MOT results.
"Vs comparable bikes" is the first-time pass rate minus the rate expected for each bike's own mix of age, mileage and test class, in percentage points: positive means better than comparable bikes. How this works.
What fails, side by side
| Component | Beta Alp 4T-200 | Honda XR250 |
|---|---|---|
| Lights & signalling | 5.6% | 7.1% |
| Steering & suspension | 4.4% | 4.8% |
| Brakes | 2.8% | 3.8% |
| Tyres & wheels | 1.3% | 3.0% |
| Drive system | 0.6% | 0.8% |
| Structure & body | 0.6% | 0.8% |
| Fuel & exhaust | 0.1% | 0.5% |
A test that fails on two components counts once in each. Component links go to the bikes most likely to fail on it.
Pass rate by test year
| Test year | Beta Alp 4T-200 | Honda XR250 |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 76.4% | 83.3% |
| 2019 | 72.7% | 78.0% |
| 2020 | 80.0% | 83.3% |
| 2021 | 80.0% | 81.7% |
| 2022 | 84.6% | 83.7% |
| 2023 | 83.0% | 84.3% |
| 2024 | 86.4% | 84.1% |
| 2025 | 78.9% | 82.6% |
Each year mixes bikes of different ages, so a fleet that is getting older tends to slip.
Pass rate by mileage
| Mileage | Beta Alp 4T-200 | Honda XR250 |
|---|---|---|
| 0k-10k miles | 82.0% | 79.5% |
| 10k-20k miles | 82.5% | 78.9% |
Bands with fewer than 30 tests for either bike are left out.
Beta Alp 4T-200 vs Honda XR250 FAQ
Which is more reliable, the Beta Alp 4T-200 or the Honda XR250?
The Beta Alp 4T-200 passes its MOT first time more often than the Honda XR250: 81.5% vs 78.8%, a 2.7-point lead. Adjusted for age, mileage and test class, the Beta Alp 4T-200 still comes out ahead: +2.8 points vs comparable bikes for the Beta Alp 4T-200, -6.8 for the Honda XR250. An MOT checks roadworthiness items, not engine or gearbox internals.
What does the Beta Alp 4T-200 fail its MOT on most?
Lights & signalling: 5.6% of Beta Alp 4T-200 MOT tests failed on it, then steering & suspension (4.4%).
What does the Honda XR250 fail its MOT on most?
Lights & signalling: 7.1% of Honda XR250 MOT tests failed on it, then steering & suspension (4.8%).
See each bike's full report (trend, mileage curve, failure breakdown and rivals) on its own page.