Data as of: DVSA MOT results to 2025
Armstrong MT vs Yamaha FZS600
The Armstrong MT passes its MOT first time more often than the Yamaha FZS600: 88.6% vs 82.6%, a 6.0-point lead.
MOT reliability, side by side
| Metric | Armstrong MT | Yamaha FZS600 |
|---|---|---|
| First-time pass rate | 88.6% | 82.6% |
| Outright fail rate | 6.3% | 10.6% |
| Vs comparable bikes (age & mileage adjusted) | +4.1 pts | -0.8 pts |
| Engine size | 500cc | 599cc |
| Median miles at test | 19,747 | 21,612 |
| MOT tests analysed | 158 | 136,558 |
| Most common failure | lighting and signalling | brakes |
First-time outcomes on normal tests, 2005–2025. "Most common failure" is the component group with the most recorded defects on failed tests. Read pass rates against test counts: a smaller sample is noisier. Source: DVSA anonymised MOT results.
"Vs comparable bikes" is the first-time pass rate minus the rate expected for each bike's own mix of age, mileage and test class, in percentage points: positive means better than comparable bikes. How this works.
Pass rate by mileage
| Mileage | Armstrong MT | Yamaha FZS600 |
|---|---|---|
| 0k-10k miles | 94.1% | 89.6% |
| 10k-20k miles | 84.1% | 85.5% |
| 20k-30k miles | 86.0% | 81.4% |
Bands with fewer than 30 tests for either bike are left out.
See each bike's full report (trend, mileage curve, failure breakdown and rivals) on its own page.