Pass rate over time
The XGJ 125-23's first-time pass rate has fallen 2.6 points since 2011, 41.5% to 38.9%.
What fails on a XGJ 125-23
| Component group | Share of defects | Defects | % of defects |
|---|---|---|---|
| lighting and signalling |
|
162 | 42.3 |
| steering and suspension |
|
55 | 14.4 |
| drive system |
|
42 | 11 |
| tyres and wheels |
|
37 | 9.7 |
| brakes |
|
35 | 9.1 |
| body and structure |
|
32 | 8.4 |
| fuel and exhaust |
|
10 | 2.6 |
| reg plates and vin |
|
4 | 1 |
| driving controls |
|
4 | 1 |
| structure and attachments |
|
2 | 0.5 |
Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects.
How rivals compare
On first-time pass rate the XGJ 125-23 beats 0 of its 4 closest rivals (YAMAHA YBR 125, HONDA CG125, HONDA CBF125).
Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the XGJ 125-23.
Pass rate by registration year
Best year to buy used: 2008 (48.5% pass). Weakest: 2007 (31.6%).
First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.