BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
League table/ YAMAHA/XJ 600 N
Model report · 2005–2025

YAMAHA XJ 600 N

598cc Petrol Class 2
76.5%
first-time pass rate
15.6%
failed outright
21,120
median miles at test
1,483
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2005–2022

The XJ 600 N's first-time pass rate has held steady since 2005 (78.7% → 78.1%).

58%75%91%2005: 78.7% pass (47 tests)2006: 78.7% pass (207 tests)2007: 69.4% pass (196 tests)2008: 76.1% pass (155 tests)2009: 63.7% pass (102 tests)2010: 77.4% pass (62 tests)2011: 72.1% pass (68 tests)2012: 82.5% pass (57 tests)2013: 80.8% pass (73 tests)2014: 80.9% pass (68 tests)2015: 85.5% pass (69 tests)2016: 78.7% pass (61 tests)2017: 75.9% pass (58 tests)2018: 85.7% pass (42 tests)2019: 67.6% pass (34 tests)2020: 84.2% pass (38 tests)2021: 66.7% pass (33 tests)2022: 78.1% pass (32 tests)20052022

Pass rate by mileage

how the XJ 600 N's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage XJ 600 N passes first time 87.0% of the time; by 50k that's 64.4%.

56%74%92%0k: 87.0% pass (262 tests)10k: 80.3% pass (432 tests)20k: 74.1% pass (401 tests)30k: 70.3% pass (209 tests)40k: 61.0% pass (100 tests)50k: 64.4% pass (45 tests)0k30k50k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a XJ 600 N

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
brakes
164 32.1 1.9×
steering and suspension
92 18 1.6×
lighting and signalling
92 18 1.1×
tyres and wheels
54 10.6 1.6×
drive system
34 6.7 2.5×
fuel and exhaust
25 4.9 2.0×
lamps and reflectors
17 3.3 0.5×
suspension
14 2.7 1.1×
structure and attachments
10 2 0.8×
tyres
9 1.8 0.8×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the XJ 600 N beats 0 of its 4 closest rivals (KAWASAKI ZX-6R, SUZUKI GSF600, YAMAHA FZS600).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the XJ 600 N.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2001 (82.4% pass). Weakest: 1998 (69.9%).

67%76%85%1995: 74.3% pass (113 tests)1996: 80.9% pass (131 tests)1997: 75.6% pass (336 tests)1998: 69.9% pass (335 tests)1999: 78.0% pass (168 tests)2000: 78.0% pass (118 tests)2001: 82.4% pass (102 tests)199519982001

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

YAMAHA XJ 600 N FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the YAMAHA XJ 600 N reliable?

The YAMAHA XJ 600 N is less reliable than average for its class: 76.5% of its 1,483 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #4123 of 5426 models.

What does a XJ 600 N fail its MOT on most?

brakes — 32% of all defects recorded against failed XJ 600 N tests.

What is the best year of XJ 600 N to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2001-registered examples do best (82.4%) and 1998 worst (69.9%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a XJ 600 N last?

The median XJ 600 N shows 21,120 miles at test, and examples around 50k miles still pass 64.4% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.