BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
League table/ YAMAHA/THUNDERCAT
Model report · 2005–2025

YAMAHA THUNDERCAT

599cc Petrol Class 2
77.0%
first-time pass rate
14.5%
failed outright
28,392
median miles at test
3,485
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2005–2025

The THUNDERCAT's first-time pass rate has fallen 8.4 points since 2005, 82.9% to 74.5%.

70%78%86%2005: 82.9% pass (35 tests)2006: 77.4% pass (283 tests)2007: 77.8% pass (257 tests)2008: 80.2% pass (243 tests)2009: 72.6% pass (248 tests)2010: 81.9% pass (221 tests)2011: 77.9% pass (249 tests)2012: 74.7% pass (233 tests)2013: 72.6% pass (223 tests)2014: 74.7% pass (229 tests)2015: 74.1% pass (197 tests)2016: 77.8% pass (194 tests)2017: 76.9% pass (169 tests)2018: 82.5% pass (114 tests)2019: 76.8% pass (99 tests)2020: 76.9% pass (78 tests)2021: 80.6% pass (103 tests)2022: 73.6% pass (110 tests)2023: 83.1% pass (83 tests)2024: 79.0% pass (62 tests)2025: 74.5% pass (55 tests)20052025

Pass rate by mileage

how the THUNDERCAT's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage THUNDERCAT passes first time 84.9% of the time; by 50k that's 72.8%.

70%79%87%0k: 84.9% pass (192 tests)10k: 80.0% pass (656 tests)20k: 79.3% pass (1,078 tests)30k: 73.8% pass (827 tests)40k: 73.9% pass (410 tests)50k: 72.8% pass (191 tests)0k30k50k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a THUNDERCAT

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
brakes
290 26.1 1.5×
lighting and signalling
245 22 1.2×
steering and suspension
206 18.5 1.5×
tyres and wheels
103 9.3 1.3×
fuel and exhaust
58 5.2 1.8×
lamps and reflectors
57 5.1 0.7×
structure and attachments
44 4 1.3×
drive system
43 3.9 1.5×
suspension
42 3.8 1.1×
reg plates and vin
25 2.2 1.2×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the THUNDERCAT beats 0 of its 4 closest rivals (KAWASAKI ZX-6R, SUZUKI GSF600, YAMAHA FZS600).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the THUNDERCAT.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2001 (80.0% pass). Weakest: 1998 (72.4%).

71%76%82%1996: 76.1% pass (1,436 tests)1997: 78.6% pass (1,208 tests)1998: 72.4% pass (373 tests)1999: 78.5% pass (144 tests)2000: 75.6% pass (135 tests)2001: 80.0% pass (55 tests)199619992001

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

YAMAHA THUNDERCAT FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the YAMAHA THUNDERCAT reliable?

The YAMAHA THUNDERCAT is less reliable than average for its class: 77.0% of its 3,485 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #4065 of 5426 models.

What does a THUNDERCAT fail its MOT on most?

brakes — 26% of all defects recorded against failed THUNDERCAT tests.

What is the best year of THUNDERCAT to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2001-registered examples do best (80.0%) and 1998 worst (72.4%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a THUNDERCAT last?

The median THUNDERCAT shows 28,392 miles at test, and examples around 50k miles still pass 72.8% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.