BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
League table/ TRIUMPH/TIGER 955I
Model report · 2005–2025
85.0%
first-time pass rate
8.3%
failed outright
19,647
median miles at test
1,402
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2006–2025

The TIGER 955I's first-time pass rate has fallen 12.8 points since 2006, 94.6% to 81.8%.

70%85%100%2006: 94.6% pass (56 tests)2007: 81.9% pass (83 tests)2008: 85.7% pass (98 tests)2009: 89.1% pass (101 tests)2010: 85.7% pass (91 tests)2011: 83.0% pass (88 tests)2012: 82.7% pass (81 tests)2013: 86.6% pass (82 tests)2014: 89.3% pass (84 tests)2015: 87.2% pass (78 tests)2016: 82.7% pass (81 tests)2017: 85.5% pass (76 tests)2018: 94.0% pass (50 tests)2019: 75.0% pass (52 tests)2020: 89.4% pass (47 tests)2021: 78.2% pass (55 tests)2022: 85.0% pass (60 tests)2023: 77.1% pass (48 tests)2024: 78.6% pass (42 tests)2025: 81.8% pass (44 tests)20062025

Pass rate by mileage

how the TIGER 955I's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage TIGER 955I passes first time 90.1% of the time; by 50k that's 72.4%.

69%81%94%0k: 90.1% pass (274 tests)10k: 87.9% pass (437 tests)20k: 83.9% pass (329 tests)30k: 83.4% pass (169 tests)40k: 79.7% pass (64 tests)50k: 72.4% pass (58 tests)0k30k50k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a TIGER 955I

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
brakes
81 40.9 1.0×
lighting and signalling
27 13.6 0.4×
lamps and reflectors
24 12.1 0.7×
structure and attachments
15 7.6 1.5×
steering and suspension
12 6.1 0.3×
drive system
9 4.5 0.7×
tyres
9 4.5 0.9×
tyres and wheels
7 3.5 0.2×
fuel and exhaust
7 3.5 0.7×
reg plates and vin
7 3.5 0.5×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the TIGER 955I beats 0 of its 4 closest rivals (TRIUMPH TIGER, DUCATI MULTISTRADA, HONDA CRF1000L Africa Twin).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the TIGER 955I.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2005 (88.2% pass). Weakest: 2001 (81.9%).

81%85%89%2001: 81.9% pass (188 tests)2002: 83.3% pass (132 tests)2003: 83.0% pass (206 tests)2004: 85.8% pass (254 tests)2005: 88.2% pass (220 tests)2006: 85.0% pass (167 tests)2007: 85.9% pass (234 tests)200120042007

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

TRIUMPH TIGER 955I FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the TRIUMPH TIGER 955I reliable?

The TRIUMPH TIGER 955I is about average for its class: 85.0% of its 1,402 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #2491 of 5426 models.

What does a TIGER 955I fail its MOT on most?

brakes — 41% of all defects recorded against failed TIGER 955I tests.

What is the best year of TIGER 955I to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2005-registered examples do best (88.2%) and 2001 worst (81.9%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a TIGER 955I last?

The median TIGER 955I shows 19,647 miles at test, and examples around 50k miles still pass 72.4% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.