BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
League table/ TRIUMPH/TIGER 90
Model report · 2005–2025
89.5%
first-time pass rate
4.1%
failed outright
12,685
median miles at test
1,908
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2005–2017

The TIGER 90's first-time pass rate has fallen 2.8 points since 2005, 88.9% to 86.1%.

81%88%95%2005: 88.9% pass (36 tests)2006: 89.7% pass (156 tests)2007: 83.0% pass (141 tests)2008: 88.0% pass (142 tests)2009: 92.2% pass (154 tests)2010: 90.3% pass (154 tests)2011: 92.9% pass (154 tests)2012: 90.0% pass (180 tests)2013: 86.7% pass (158 tests)2014: 92.9% pass (155 tests)2015: 88.5% pass (157 tests)2016: 91.8% pass (134 tests)2017: 86.1% pass (115 tests)20052017

Pass rate by mileage

how the TIGER 90's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage TIGER 90 passes first time 90.0% of the time; by 50k that's 89.6%.

84%89%93%0k: 90.0% pass (850 tests)10k: 90.0% pass (340 tests)20k: 91.8% pass (220 tests)30k: 86.4% pass (184 tests)40k: 85.7% pass (140 tests)50k: 89.6% pass (67 tests)0k30k50k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a TIGER 90

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
steering and suspension
43 30.5 0.6×
lighting and signalling
39 27.7 0.4×
brakes
21 14.9 0.2×
tyres and wheels
15 10.6 0.4×
drive system
8 5.7 0.4×
fuel and exhaust
4 2.8 0.3×
driving controls
4 2.8 0.9×
body and structure
3 2.1 0.3×
steering
2 1.4 0.1×
Items Not Tested
2 1.4 0.6×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the TIGER 90 beats 0 of its 1 closest rivals (ROYAL ENFIELD HIMALAYAN).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the TIGER 90.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 1966 (91.6% pass). Weakest: 1964 (88.6%).

88%90%92%1963: 89.9% pass (277 tests)1964: 88.6% pass (413 tests)1965: 89.1% pass (385 tests)1966: 91.6% pass (298 tests)1967: 90.5% pass (189 tests)1968: 89.5% pass (133 tests)196319661968

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

TRIUMPH TIGER 90 FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the TRIUMPH TIGER 90 reliable?

The TRIUMPH TIGER 90 is more reliable than average for its class: 89.5% of its 1,908 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #1111 of 5426 models.

What does a TIGER 90 fail its MOT on most?

steering and suspension — 30% of all defects recorded against failed TIGER 90 tests.

What is the best year of TIGER 90 to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 1966-registered examples do best (91.6%) and 1964 worst (88.6%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a TIGER 90 last?

The median TIGER 90 shows 12,685 miles at test, and examples around 50k miles still pass 89.6% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.