BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
League table/ TRIUMPH/TIGER 750
Model report · 2005–2025
88.0%
first-time pass rate
5.1%
failed outright
20,028
median miles at test
510
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2006–2017

The TIGER 750's first-time pass rate has risen 5.9 points since 2006, 84.4% to 90.3%.

72%86%100%2006: 84.4% pass (45 tests)2007: 89.1% pass (46 tests)2008: 92.1% pass (38 tests)2009: 100.0% pass (39 tests)2010: 86.1% pass (36 tests)2011: 88.9% pass (36 tests)2012: 83.9% pass (31 tests)2013: 86.4% pass (44 tests)2014: 84.6% pass (39 tests)2015: 86.1% pass (36 tests)2016: 77.8% pass (36 tests)2017: 90.3% pass (31 tests)20062017

Pass rate by mileage

how the TIGER 750's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage TIGER 750 passes first time 90.9% of the time; by 40k that's 88.2%.

84%88%92%0k: 90.9% pass (121 tests)10k: 85.0% pass (133 tests)20k: 87.2% pass (109 tests)30k: 88.5% pass (87 tests)40k: 88.2% pass (34 tests)0k20k40k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a TIGER 750

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
18 30.5 0.6×
steering and suspension
15 25.4 0.6×
brakes
14 23.7 0.5×
tyres and wheels
5 8.5 0.4×
driving controls
2 3.4 1.7×
drive system
2 3.4 0.5×
structure and attachments
1 1.7 0.3×
suspension
1 1.7 0.3×
Items Not Tested
1 1.7 2.1×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the TIGER 750 beats 2 of its 4 closest rivals (TRIUMPH TIGER, TRIUMPH TIGER 800, TRIUMPH ADVENTURER).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the TIGER 750.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 1981 (88.9% pass). Weakest: 1979 (85.2%).

84%87%90%1976: 88.7% pass (62 tests)1977: 85.9% pass (85 tests)1978: 88.0% pass (117 tests)1979: 85.2% pass (54 tests)1981: 88.9% pass (54 tests)197619781981

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

TRIUMPH TIGER 750 FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the TRIUMPH TIGER 750 reliable?

The TRIUMPH TIGER 750 is more reliable than average for its class: 88.0% of its 510 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #1604 of 5426 models.

What does a TIGER 750 fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 31% of all defects recorded against failed TIGER 750 tests.

What is the best year of TIGER 750 to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 1981-registered examples do best (88.9%) and 1979 worst (85.2%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a TIGER 750 last?

The median TIGER 750 shows 20,028 miles at test, and examples around 40k miles still pass 88.2% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.