BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025

TGB 302

49cc Petrol Class 1
#4436 of 5426 overall #4 of 13 TGBs #162 of 455 moped bikes
73.6%
first-time pass rate
18.7%
failed outright
9,880
median miles at test
1,060
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2006–2017

The 302's first-time pass rate has fallen 12.0 points since 2006, 87.0% to 75.0%.

62%77%92%2006: 87.0% pass (46 tests)2007: 78.4% pass (74 tests)2008: 72.7% pass (77 tests)2009: 73.8% pass (84 tests)2010: 72.7% pass (77 tests)2011: 76.1% pass (113 tests)2012: 74.4% pass (129 tests)2013: 70.9% pass (117 tests)2014: 70.1% pass (97 tests)2015: 67.1% pass (70 tests)2016: 77.1% pass (48 tests)2017: 75.0% pass (40 tests)20062017

Pass rate by mileage

how the 302's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 73.4%

A low-mileage 302 passes first time 75.2% of the time; by 20k that's 69.7%.

69%72%76%0k: 75.2% pass (541 tests)10k: 72.2% pass (443 tests)20k: 69.7% pass (66 tests)0k10k20k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a 302

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
142 29.3 2.0×
steering and suspension
115 23.8 2.6×
brakes
113 23.3 1.8×
fuel and exhaust
30 6.2 3.0×
tyres and wheels
25 5.2 1.2×
lamps and reflectors
24 5 0.7×
body and structure
14 2.9 2.4×
driving controls
9 1.9 3.2×
reg plates and vin
6 1.2 0.8×
structure and attachments
6 1.2 0.7×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the 302 beats 4 of its 4 closest rivals (PEUGEOT SPEEDFIGHT, PIAGGIO ZIP, PIAGGIO NRG).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the 302.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2002 (82.1% pass). Weakest: 2007 (66.3%).

63%74%85%2002: 82.1% pass (78 tests)2003: 79.0% pass (167 tests)2004: 69.3% pass (163 tests)2005: 73.1% pass (93 tests)2007: 66.3% pass (101 tests)2008: 75.0% pass (208 tests)2009: 77.8% pass (90 tests)200220052009

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

TGB 302 FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the TGB 302 reliable?

The TGB 302 is about average for its class: 73.6% of its 1,060 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 73.4%. That ranks it #4436 of 5426 models.

What does a 302 fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 29% of all defects recorded against failed 302 tests.

What is the best year of 302 to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2002-registered examples do best (82.1%) and 2007 worst (66.3%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a 302 last?

The median 302 shows 9,880 miles at test, and examples around 20k miles still pass 69.7% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.