BIKERELIABILITY Reg check
League table/ ROYAL ENFIELD/CONTINENTAL GT
Model report · 2005–2025

ROYAL ENFIELD CONTINENTAL GT

250cc Petrol Class 2
89.9%
first-time pass rate
3.8%
failed outright
3,820
median miles at test
557
MOT tests, 2005–2025
+2.0pp
vs expected · age & mileage

The pass rate is the MOT first-time pass: a roadworthiness check of the items an MOT covers (brakes, lights, tyres, steering, structure, emissions), not a full mechanical inspection of engine or gearbox internals. It is a reliability signal, not a complete measure of mechanical reliability. What this measures.

“vs expected” adjusts for age, mileage and test class, so a cherished classic and a hard-used commuter are compared fairly. How this works.

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2006–2017

The CONTINENTAL GT's first-time pass rate has risen 3.9 points since 2006, 86.7% to 90.6%.

86%89%92%2006: 86.7% pass (30 tests)2016: 86.7% pass (60 tests)2017: 90.6% pass (53 tests)20062017

What fails on a CONTINENTAL GT

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lamps and reflectors
7 21.9 0.5×
steering and suspension
6 18.8 0.2×
lighting and signalling
5 15.6 0.2×
structure and attachments
4 12.5 0.8×
body and structure
3 9.4 0.7×
Identification of the vehicle
2 6.2 1.6×
brakes
2 6.2 0.1×
wheels
1 3.1 3.0×
fuel and exhaust
1 3.1 0.2×
steering
1 3.1 0.4×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the CONTINENTAL GT beats 4 of its 4 closest rivals (YAMAHA YP250, YAMAHA WR250F, HONDA XR250).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the CONTINENTAL GT.

Compare with any bike

rival not listed above? pick any model to see it head-to-head with the Continental GT

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 1966 (92.6% pass). Weakest: 1965 (89.3%).

89%91%93%1965: 89.3% pass (84 tests)1966: 92.6% pass (135 tests)2013: 89.9% pass (227 tests)196519662013

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

ROYAL ENFIELD CONTINENTAL GT FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the ROYAL ENFIELD CONTINENTAL GT reliable?

The ROYAL ENFIELD CONTINENTAL GT is more reliable than average for its class: 89.9% of its 557 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #988 of 5428 models.

What does a CONTINENTAL GT fail its MOT on most?

lamps and reflectors — 22% of all defects recorded against failed CONTINENTAL GT tests.

What is the best year of CONTINENTAL GT to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 1966-registered examples do best (92.6%) and 1965 worst (89.3%). Condition and history still trump the year.

Embed this bike

Free to embed on your site, blog or forum — a live Royal Enfield Continental GT reliability card that stays up to date and links back here. More on the free API page.