QINGQI QM 50 QT-2
Pass rate over time
The QM 50 QT-2's first-time pass rate has fallen 1.2 points since 2014, 73.7% to 72.5%.
What fails on a QM 50 QT-2
| Component group | Share of defects | Defects | % of defects |
|---|---|---|---|
| lighting and signalling |
|
28 | 23.7 |
| brakes |
|
26 | 22 |
| steering and suspension |
|
26 | 22 |
| lamps and reflectors |
|
15 | 12.7 |
| body and structure |
|
6 | 5.1 |
| suspension |
|
4 | 3.4 |
| tyres and wheels |
|
4 | 3.4 |
| steering |
|
3 | 2.5 |
| structure and attachments |
|
3 | 2.5 |
| tyres |
|
3 | 2.5 |
Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects.
How rivals compare
On first-time pass rate the QM 50 QT-2 beats 4 of its 4 closest rivals (PEUGEOT SPEEDFIGHT, PIAGGIO ZIP, PIAGGIO NRG).
Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the QM 50 QT-2.
Pass rate by registration year
Best year to buy used: 2012 (80.6% pass). Weakest: 2011 (72.0%).
First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.