BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025

QINGQI QM

124cc Petrol Class 1
#5166 of 5426 overall #4 of 10 QINGQIs #601 of 734 commuter bikes
61.4%
first-time pass rate
29.0%
failed outright
7,994
median miles at test
6,653
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2016–2025

The QM's first-time pass rate has risen 9.6 points since 2016, 58.2% to 67.8%.

55%63%70%2016: 58.2% pass (55 tests)2017: 61.9% pass (604 tests)2018: 61.2% pass (727 tests)2019: 60.5% pass (952 tests)2020: 64.8% pass (1,117 tests)2021: 60.8% pass (1,060 tests)2022: 60.0% pass (831 tests)2023: 57.7% pass (629 tests)2024: 60.5% pass (365 tests)2025: 67.8% pass (298 tests)20162025

Pass rate by mileage

how the QM's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 73.4%

A low-mileage QM passes first time 65.2% of the time; by 40k that's 54.3%.

46%57%68%0k: 65.2% pass (3,860 tests)10k: 54.0% pass (1,910 tests)20k: 56.0% pass (482 tests)30k: 49.1% pass (116 tests)40k: 54.3% pass (35 tests)0k20k40k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a QM

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lamps and reflectors
2,042 30.6 10.5×
brakes
1,203 18 2.8×
structure and attachments
1,141 17.1 14.9×
suspension
849 12.7 12.3×
steering
336 5 10.3×
lighting and signalling
329 4.9 0.7×
tyres
286 4.3 5.5×
steering and suspension
209 3.1 0.7×
wheels
158 2.4 30.1×
audible warning (Horn)
112 1.7 9.1×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the QM beats 0 of its 4 closest rivals (YAMAHA YBR 125, HONDA CG125, HONDA CBF125).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the QM.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2017 (69.3% pass). Weakest: 2011 (53.6%).

50%61%72%2011: 53.6% pass (140 tests)2012: 61.8% pass (233 tests)2013: 58.7% pass (414 tests)2014: 61.6% pass (1,738 tests)2015: 60.7% pass (1,648 tests)2016: 59.4% pass (1,430 tests)2017: 69.3% pass (900 tests)2018: 55.4% pass (65 tests)201120152018

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

QINGQI QM FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the QINGQI QM reliable?

The QINGQI QM is less reliable than average for its class: 61.4% of its 6,653 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 73.4%. That ranks it #5166 of 5426 models.

What does a QM fail its MOT on most?

lamps and reflectors — 31% of all defects recorded against failed QM tests.

What is the best year of QM to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2017-registered examples do best (69.3%) and 2011 worst (53.6%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a QM last?

The median QM shows 7,994 miles at test, and examples around 40k miles still pass 54.3% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.