BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025

PULSE XF

125cc Petrol Class 1
#5301 of 5426 overall #7 of 8 PULSEs #671 of 734 commuter bikes
57.2%
first-time pass rate
32.6%
failed outright
8,642
median miles at test
2,063
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2016–2025

The XF's first-time pass rate has risen 9.2 points since 2016, 48.7% to 57.9%.

44%58%71%2016: 48.7% pass (39 tests)2017: 57.7% pass (362 tests)2018: 58.3% pass (343 tests)2019: 48.8% pass (285 tests)2020: 60.3% pass (239 tests)2021: 60.6% pass (246 tests)2022: 53.3% pass (214 tests)2023: 60.2% pass (166 tests)2024: 66.3% pass (92 tests)2025: 57.9% pass (76 tests)20162025

Pass rate by mileage

how the XF's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 73.4%

A low-mileage XF passes first time 60.0% of the time; by 30k that's 56.4%.

44%53%63%0k: 60.0% pass (1,151 tests)10k: 56.2% pass (646 tests)20k: 46.8% pass (173 tests)30k: 56.4% pass (39 tests)0k20k30k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a XF

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lamps and reflectors
698 26.8 10.7×
brakes
502 19.3 3.5×
structure and attachments
404 15.5 17.5×
suspension
338 13 16.0×
lighting and signalling
223 8.6 1.3×
steering and suspension
149 5.7 1.5×
tyres
93 3.6 5.8×
steering
85 3.3 8.5×
drive system
79 3 4.0×
Identification of the vehicle
35 1.3 7.3×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the XF beats 0 of its 4 closest rivals (YAMAHA YBR 125, HONDA CG125, HONDA CBF125).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the XF.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2015 (60.4% pass). Weakest: 2012 (49.2%).

47%55%63%2012: 49.2% pass (120 tests)2013: 53.9% pass (356 tests)2014: 58.1% pass (1,094 tests)2015: 60.4% pass (419 tests)201220142015

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

PULSE XF FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the PULSE XF reliable?

The PULSE XF is less reliable than average for its class: 57.2% of its 2,063 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 73.4%. That ranks it #5301 of 5426 models.

What does a XF fail its MOT on most?

lamps and reflectors — 27% of all defects recorded against failed XF tests.

What is the best year of XF to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2015-registered examples do best (60.4%) and 2012 worst (49.2%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a XF last?

The median XF shows 8,642 miles at test, and examples around 30k miles still pass 56.4% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.