Pass rate over time
The XF's first-time pass rate has risen 4.3 points since 2017, 70.7% to 75.0%.
What fails on a XF
| Component group | Share of defects | Defects | % of defects |
|---|---|---|---|
| lamps and reflectors |
|
109 | 30.5 |
| structure and attachments |
|
74 | 20.7 |
| suspension |
|
44 | 12.3 |
| brakes |
|
32 | 9 |
| steering |
|
29 | 8.1 |
| lighting and signalling |
|
23 | 6.4 |
| steering and suspension |
|
21 | 5.9 |
| drive system |
|
15 | 4.2 |
| tyres |
|
6 | 1.7 |
| Identification of the vehicle |
|
4 | 1.1 |
Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects.
How rivals compare
On first-time pass rate the XF beats 0 of its 4 closest rivals (YAMAHA YBR 125, HONDA CG125, HONDA CBF125).
Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the XF.
Pass rate by registration year
Best year to buy used: 2012 (67.8% pass). Weakest: 2011 (59.4%).
First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.