BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025
79.7%
first-time pass rate
16.2%
failed outright
12,148
median miles at test
611
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2006–2014

The X9 250's first-time pass rate has fallen 2.4 points since 2006, 76.6% to 74.2%.

64%82%100%2006: 76.6% pass (77 tests)2007: 73.2% pass (82 tests)2008: 86.9% pass (61 tests)2009: 70.6% pass (51 tests)2010: 83.3% pass (36 tests)2011: 78.6% pass (42 tests)2012: 87.2% pass (39 tests)2013: 96.7% pass (30 tests)2014: 74.2% pass (31 tests)20062014

Pass rate by mileage

how the X9 250's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage X9 250 passes first time 82.4% of the time; by 20k that's 69.0%.

66%76%85%0k: 82.4% pass (256 tests)10k: 79.5% pass (229 tests)20k: 69.0% pass (84 tests)0k10k20k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a X9 250

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
steering and suspension
55 25.2 2.2×
brakes
54 24.8 1.5×
lighting and signalling
46 21.1 1.5×
tyres and wheels
20 9.2 1.6×
fuel and exhaust
14 6.4 2.4×
lamps and reflectors
11 5 0.7×
suspension
8 3.7 1.3×
tyres
4 1.8 1.0×
body and structure
3 1.4 1.0×
driving controls
3 1.4 2.1×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the X9 250 beats 1 of its 4 closest rivals (PIAGGIO PX 200 E, PIAGGIO X9, LAMBRETTA GP200).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the X9 250.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2006 (88.7% pass). Weakest: 2000 (74.5%).

72%82%92%2000: 74.5% pass (102 tests)2001: 76.4% pass (110 tests)2002: 79.1% pass (86 tests)2004: 88.2% pass (51 tests)2006: 88.7% pass (71 tests)2007: 80.9% pass (110 tests)200020042007

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

PIAGGIO X9 250 FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the PIAGGIO X9 250 reliable?

The PIAGGIO X9 250 is less reliable than average for its class: 79.7% of its 611 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #3647 of 5426 models.

What does a X9 250 fail its MOT on most?

steering and suspension — 25% of all defects recorded against failed X9 250 tests.

What is the best year of X9 250 to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2006-registered examples do best (88.7%) and 2000 worst (74.5%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a X9 250 last?

The median X9 250 shows 12,148 miles at test, and examples around 20k miles still pass 69.0% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.