BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025
91.4%
first-time pass rate
4.6%
failed outright
3,516
median miles at test
674
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2006–2018

The 200's first-time pass rate has fallen 4.8 points since 2006, 89.2% to 84.4%.

82%90%99%2006: 89.2% pass (37 tests)2007: 88.9% pass (36 tests)2008: 90.5% pass (42 tests)2009: 89.4% pass (47 tests)2010: 90.7% pass (43 tests)2011: 89.6% pass (48 tests)2012: 93.8% pass (48 tests)2013: 96.0% pass (50 tests)2014: 88.1% pass (59 tests)2015: 92.3% pass (52 tests)2016: 90.0% pass (50 tests)2017: 95.8% pass (48 tests)2018: 84.4% pass (32 tests)20062018

Pass rate by mileage

how the 200's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 73.4%

A low-mileage 200 passes first time 91.9% of the time; by 30k that's 80.9%.

78%87%96%0k: 91.9% pass (471 tests)10k: 93.3% pass (60 tests)20k: 92.4% pass (66 tests)30k: 80.9% pass (47 tests)0k20k30k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a 200

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
brakes
27 32.1 0.6×
lighting and signalling
21 25 0.5×
steering and suspension
16 19 0.5×
tyres and wheels
6 7.1 0.4×
lamps and reflectors
5 6 0.3×
reg plates and vin
4 4.8 0.5×
fuel and exhaust
2 2.4 0.2×
driving controls
1 1.2 0.6×
suspension
1 1.2 0.2×
body and structure
1 1.2 0.3×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the 200 beats 4 of its 4 closest rivals (PIAGGIO PX 200 E, PIAGGIO X9, LAMBRETTA GP200).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the 200.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 1966 (98.6% pass). Weakest: 1967 (88.5%).

86%93%100%1965: 92.7% pass (55 tests)1966: 98.6% pass (70 tests)1967: 88.5% pass (52 tests)1970: 89.5% pass (57 tests)1981: 90.2% pass (51 tests)196519671981

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

LAMBRETTA 200 FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the LAMBRETTA 200 reliable?

The LAMBRETTA 200 is more reliable than average for its class: 91.4% of its 674 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 73.4%. That ranks it #587 of 5426 models.

What does a 200 fail its MOT on most?

brakes — 32% of all defects recorded against failed 200 tests.

What is the best year of 200 to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 1966-registered examples do best (98.6%) and 1967 worst (88.5%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a 200 last?

The median 200 shows 3,516 miles at test, and examples around 30k miles still pass 80.9% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.