BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
League table/ KTM/500 EXC 12
Model report · 2005–2025

KTM 500 EXC 12

510cc Petrol Class 2
#3626 of 5426 overall #157 of 230 KTMs #2313 of 2787 other bikes
79.8%
first-time pass rate
6.5%
failed outright
3,091
median miles at test
352
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2015–2021

The 500 EXC 12's first-time pass rate has held steady since 2015 (75.6% → 75.6%).

72%78%84%2015: 75.6% pass (41 tests)2016: 81.8% pass (44 tests)2017: 73.7% pass (38 tests)2018: 78.1% pass (32 tests)2021: 75.6% pass (41 tests)20152021

What fails on a 500 EXC 12

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects
lighting and signalling
18 27.7
lamps and reflectors
11 16.9
reg plates and vin
8 12.3
brakes
8 12.3
steering and suspension
6 9.2
drive system
4 6.2
wheels
3 4.6
audible warning (Horn)
3 4.6
suspension
3 4.6
Identification of the vehicle
1 1.5

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the 500 EXC 12 beats 2 of its 4 closest rivals (KAWASAKI ZX-6R, SUZUKI GSF600, YAMAHA FZS600).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the 500 EXC 12.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2012 (80.8% pass). Weakest: 2011 (78.9%).

78%80%82%2011: 78.9% pass (133 tests)2012: 80.8% pass (214 tests)20112012

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.