BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025

KAWASAKI KLX250

249cc Petrol Class 2
79.2%
first-time pass rate
12.0%
failed outright
8,918
median miles at test
2,796
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2005–2025

The KLX250's first-time pass rate has risen 20.2 points since 2005, 61.4% to 81.6%.

55%75%95%2005: 61.4% pass (44 tests)2006: 72.6% pass (157 tests)2007: 74.0% pass (131 tests)2008: 75.4% pass (134 tests)2009: 69.1% pass (136 tests)2010: 75.6% pass (119 tests)2011: 79.2% pass (130 tests)2012: 79.9% pass (169 tests)2013: 75.4% pass (187 tests)2014: 79.2% pass (202 tests)2015: 77.1% pass (188 tests)2016: 86.5% pass (178 tests)2017: 77.8% pass (158 tests)2018: 75.5% pass (110 tests)2019: 86.7% pass (120 tests)2020: 87.2% pass (109 tests)2021: 87.0% pass (138 tests)2022: 83.8% pass (117 tests)2023: 88.0% pass (108 tests)2024: 86.5% pass (74 tests)2025: 81.6% pass (87 tests)20052025

Pass rate by mileage

how the KLX250's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage KLX250 passes first time 82.4% of the time; by 40k that's 83.3%.

69%77%86%0k: 82.4% pass (1,445 tests)10k: 75.5% pass (711 tests)20k: 76.5% pass (324 tests)30k: 71.6% pass (109 tests)40k: 83.3% pass (54 tests)0k20k40k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a KLX250

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
274 30.3 1.3×
brakes
177 19.6 1.1×
steering and suspension
160 17.7 1.4×
tyres and wheels
105 11.6 1.4×
reg plates and vin
51 5.6 2.4×
lamps and reflectors
46 5.1 0.7×
drive system
43 4.8 1.5×
suspension
22 2.4 0.8×
tyres
14 1.5 0.6×
fuel and exhaust
13 1.4 0.5×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the KLX250 beats 0 of its 1 closest rivals (HONDA CRF250).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the KLX250.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2011 (86.3% pass). Weakest: 1998 (68.0%).

64%77%90%1993: 75.9% pass (353 tests)1994: 75.0% pass (268 tests)1995: 71.8% pass (277 tests)1996: 72.6% pass (190 tests)1997: 74.1% pass (212 tests)1998: 68.0% pass (75 tests)1999: 79.8% pass (94 tests)2000: 78.4% pass (74 tests)2008: 73.4% pass (64 tests)2009: 85.8% pass (506 tests)2010: 85.5% pass (269 tests)2011: 86.3% pass (131 tests)199319992011

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

KAWASAKI KLX250 FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the KAWASAKI KLX250 reliable?

The KAWASAKI KLX250 is less reliable than average for its class: 79.2% of its 2,796 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #3733 of 5426 models.

What does a KLX250 fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 30% of all defects recorded against failed KLX250 tests.

What is the best year of KLX250 to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2011-registered examples do best (86.3%) and 1998 worst (68.0%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a KLX250 last?

The median KLX250 shows 8,918 miles at test, and examples around 40k miles still pass 83.3% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.