BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025

KAWASAKI ER500-C1

498cc Petrol Class 2
81.1%
first-time pass rate
11.3%
failed outright
15,217
median miles at test
1,110
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2006–2019

The ER500-C1's first-time pass rate has held steady since 2006 (79.3% → 80.0%).

72%80%87%2006: 79.3% pass (150 tests)2007: 79.0% pass (143 tests)2008: 82.3% pass (124 tests)2009: 74.2% pass (89 tests)2010: 83.0% pass (53 tests)2011: 84.0% pass (50 tests)2012: 76.0% pass (50 tests)2013: 78.7% pass (47 tests)2014: 82.0% pass (50 tests)2015: 84.8% pass (46 tests)2016: 78.0% pass (41 tests)2017: 81.4% pass (43 tests)2019: 80.0% pass (30 tests)20062019

Pass rate by mileage

how the ER500-C1's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage ER500-C1 passes first time 89.2% of the time; by 40k that's 69.0%.

65%79%93%0k: 89.2% pass (370 tests)10k: 79.8% pass (327 tests)20k: 77.8% pass (221 tests)30k: 72.0% pass (100 tests)40k: 69.0% pass (42 tests)0k20k40k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a ER500-C1

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
brakes
73 24.6 1.2×
steering and suspension
68 22.9 1.3×
lighting and signalling
60 20.2 0.9×
tyres and wheels
37 12.5 1.4×
drive system
21 7.1 1.7×
lamps and reflectors
12 4 0.3×
driving controls
11 3.7 4.2×
tyres
6 2 0.5×
body and structure
5 1.7 0.8×
structure and attachments
4 1.3 0.4×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the ER500-C1 beats 3 of its 4 closest rivals (KAWASAKI ZX-6R, SUZUKI GSF600, YAMAHA FZS600).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the ER500-C1.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2005 (88.5% pass). Weakest: 2002 (77.7%).

76%83%91%2001: 78.6% pass (304 tests)2002: 77.7% pass (364 tests)2003: 88.0% pass (158 tests)2004: 83.0% pass (223 tests)2005: 88.5% pass (61 tests)200120032005

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

KAWASAKI ER500-C1 FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the KAWASAKI ER500-C1 reliable?

The KAWASAKI ER500-C1 is less reliable than average for its class: 81.1% of its 1,110 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #3356 of 5426 models.

What does a ER500-C1 fail its MOT on most?

brakes — 25% of all defects recorded against failed ER500-C1 tests.

What is the best year of ER500-C1 to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2005-registered examples do best (88.5%) and 2002 worst (77.7%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a ER500-C1 last?

The median ER500-C1 shows 15,217 miles at test, and examples around 40k miles still pass 69.0% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.