HONDA CBF 600 NA-4
What fails on a CBF 600 NA-4
| Component group | Share of defects | Defects | % of defects |
|---|---|---|---|
| brakes |
|
16 | 30.8 |
| lamps and reflectors |
|
10 | 19.2 |
| structure and attachments |
|
7 | 13.5 |
| tyres and wheels |
|
5 | 9.6 |
| steering and suspension |
|
5 | 9.6 |
| drive system |
|
3 | 5.8 |
| suspension |
|
2 | 3.8 |
| lighting and signalling |
|
2 | 3.8 |
| audible warning (Horn) |
|
1 | 1.9 |
| tyres |
|
1 | 1.9 |
Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects.
How rivals compare
On first-time pass rate the CBF 600 NA-4 beats 4 of its 4 closest rivals (KAWASAKI ZX-6R, SUZUKI GSF600, YAMAHA FZS600).
Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the CBF 600 NA-4.
Pass rate by registration year
Best year to buy used: 2005 (77.0% pass). Weakest: 2005 (77.0%).
First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.