BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
League table/ HONDA/CB400F2
Model report · 2005–2025
84.6%
first-time pass rate
9.9%
failed outright
25,548
median miles at test
680
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2006–2017

The CB400F2's first-time pass rate has risen 3.1 points since 2006, 86.0% to 89.1%.

59%79%99%2006: 86.0% pass (57 tests)2007: 88.1% pass (42 tests)2008: 87.0% pass (46 tests)2009: 88.6% pass (44 tests)2010: 65.4% pass (52 tests)2011: 74.5% pass (51 tests)2012: 79.1% pass (43 tests)2013: 84.6% pass (52 tests)2014: 84.6% pass (52 tests)2015: 88.7% pass (53 tests)2016: 92.2% pass (51 tests)2017: 89.1% pass (46 tests)20062017

Pass rate by mileage

how the CB400F2's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage CB400F2 passes first time 90.0% of the time; by 50k that's 83.9%.

76%84%92%0k: 90.0% pass (90 tests)10k: 89.3% pass (159 tests)20k: 87.2% pass (149 tests)30k: 78.1% pass (137 tests)40k: 81.9% pass (72 tests)50k: 83.9% pass (31 tests)0k30k50k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a CB400F2

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
50 31.6 0.9×
brakes
32 20.3 0.9×
steering and suspension
29 18.4 1.0×
tyres and wheels
14 8.9 0.9×
fuel and exhaust
8 5.1 1.4×
drive system
8 5.1 1.2×
lamps and reflectors
6 3.8 0.2×
body and structure
4 2.5 1.2×
driving controls
4 2.5 2.5×
tyres
3 1.9 0.6×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the CB400F2 beats 3 of its 3 closest rivals (HONDA CB500, HONDA CB400, HONDA CB400N).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the CB400F2.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 1978 (86.4% pass). Weakest: 1992 (80.4%).

79%83%88%1977: 84.2% pass (215 tests)1978: 86.4% pass (228 tests)1992: 80.4% pass (51 tests)197719781992

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

HONDA CB400F2 FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the HONDA CB400F2 reliable?

The HONDA CB400F2 is about average for its class: 84.6% of its 680 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #2593 of 5426 models.

What does a CB400F2 fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 32% of all defects recorded against failed CB400F2 tests.

What is the best year of CB400F2 to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 1978-registered examples do best (86.4%) and 1992 worst (80.4%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a CB400F2 last?

The median CB400F2 shows 25,548 miles at test, and examples around 50k miles still pass 83.9% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.