BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025
87.4%
first-time pass rate
4.7%
failed outright
13,139
median miles at test
2,932
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2006–2025

The FXSTDI's first-time pass rate has held steady since 2006 (88.9% → 89.4%).

79%87%94%2006: 88.9% pass (117 tests)2007: 87.9% pass (149 tests)2008: 81.8% pass (192 tests)2009: 84.2% pass (203 tests)2010: 85.5% pass (172 tests)2011: 85.5% pass (172 tests)2012: 87.7% pass (155 tests)2013: 87.5% pass (160 tests)2014: 90.3% pass (155 tests)2015: 84.4% pass (154 tests)2016: 88.8% pass (160 tests)2017: 82.8% pass (157 tests)2018: 88.9% pass (126 tests)2019: 88.3% pass (120 tests)2020: 89.8% pass (108 tests)2021: 91.5% pass (141 tests)2022: 90.2% pass (133 tests)2023: 91.7% pass (133 tests)2024: 89.8% pass (108 tests)2025: 89.4% pass (104 tests)20062025

Pass rate by mileage

how the FXSTDI's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage FXSTDI passes first time 89.0% of the time; by 50k that's 78.1%.

76%84%91%0k: 89.0% pass (1,081 tests)10k: 87.2% pass (960 tests)20k: 86.5% pass (550 tests)30k: 84.3% pass (185 tests)40k: 86.1% pass (72 tests)50k: 78.1% pass (32 tests)0k30k50k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a FXSTDI

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
75 32.3 0.4×
brakes
45 19.4 0.3×
reg plates and vin
31 13.4 1.4×
tyres and wheels
28 12.1 0.4×
fuel and exhaust
23 9.9 1.0×
lamps and reflectors
14 6 0.3×
steering and suspension
6 2.6 0.1×
structure and attachments
5 2.2 0.2×
Identification of the vehicle
3 1.3 0.4×
tyres
2 0.9 0.1×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the FXSTDI beats 0 of its 4 closest rivals (HARLEY-DAVIDSON FLSTF, HARLEY-DAVIDSON FLSTC, HARLEY-DAVIDSON XL1200C).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the FXSTDI.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2001 (89.5% pass). Weakest: 2003 (84.6%).

84%87%90%2000: 86.5% pass (52 tests)2001: 89.5% pass (513 tests)2002: 88.3% pass (489 tests)2003: 84.6% pass (602 tests)2004: 87.5% pass (673 tests)2005: 88.0% pass (415 tests)2006: 88.1% pass (159 tests)200020032006

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

HARLEY-DAVIDSON FXSTDI FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the HARLEY-DAVIDSON FXSTDI reliable?

The HARLEY-DAVIDSON FXSTDI is more reliable than average for its class: 87.4% of its 2,932 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #1784 of 5426 models.

What does a FXSTDI fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 32% of all defects recorded against failed FXSTDI tests.

What is the best year of FXSTDI to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2001-registered examples do best (89.5%) and 2003 worst (84.6%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a FXSTDI last?

The median FXSTDI shows 13,139 miles at test, and examples around 50k miles still pass 78.1% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.