BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025
87.8%
first-time pass rate
4.7%
failed outright
12,998
median miles at test
2,681
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2006–2025

The FXSTD's first-time pass rate has fallen 4.8 points since 2006, 90.4% to 85.6%.

80%86%93%2006: 90.4% pass (167 tests)2007: 89.4% pass (161 tests)2008: 88.8% pass (161 tests)2009: 88.4% pass (164 tests)2010: 82.2% pass (152 tests)2011: 87.0% pass (161 tests)2012: 86.9% pass (137 tests)2013: 87.9% pass (140 tests)2014: 86.8% pass (144 tests)2015: 88.4% pass (138 tests)2016: 88.7% pass (141 tests)2017: 88.7% pass (133 tests)2018: 85.4% pass (96 tests)2019: 88.0% pass (125 tests)2020: 90.5% pass (95 tests)2021: 87.1% pass (124 tests)2022: 89.2% pass (120 tests)2023: 89.1% pass (119 tests)2024: 86.7% pass (90 tests)2025: 85.6% pass (97 tests)20062025

Pass rate by mileage

how the FXSTD's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage FXSTD passes first time 88.7% of the time; by 50k that's 87.0%.

84%87%90%0k: 88.7% pass (1,016 tests)10k: 87.0% pass (798 tests)20k: 88.1% pass (444 tests)30k: 88.7% pass (194 tests)40k: 84.7% pass (111 tests)50k: 87.0% pass (54 tests)0k30k50k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a FXSTD

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
76 32.3 0.5×
brakes
37 15.7 0.3×
lamps and reflectors
36 15.3 0.5×
reg plates and vin
29 12.3 1.7×
tyres and wheels
16 6.8 0.3×
fuel and exhaust
13 5.5 0.6×
tyres
11 4.7 0.5×
steering and suspension
9 3.8 0.1×
Identification of the vehicle
6 2.6 1.0×
structure and attachments
2 0.9 0.1×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the FXSTD beats 0 of its 4 closest rivals (HARLEY-DAVIDSON FLSTF, HARLEY-DAVIDSON FLSTC, HARLEY-DAVIDSON XL1200C).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the FXSTD.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2002 (89.4% pass). Weakest: 2004 (84.3%).

83%87%90%2000: 86.3% pass (531 tests)2001: 88.1% pass (555 tests)2002: 89.4% pass (631 tests)2003: 88.5% pass (783 tests)2004: 84.3% pass (51 tests)200020022004

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

HARLEY-DAVIDSON FXSTD FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the HARLEY-DAVIDSON FXSTD reliable?

The HARLEY-DAVIDSON FXSTD is more reliable than average for its class: 87.8% of its 2,681 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #1666 of 5426 models.

What does a FXSTD fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 32% of all defects recorded against failed FXSTD tests.

What is the best year of FXSTD to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2002-registered examples do best (89.4%) and 2004 worst (84.3%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a FXSTD last?

The median FXSTD shows 12,998 miles at test, and examples around 50k miles still pass 87.0% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.