BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025
89.2%
first-time pass rate
4.2%
failed outright
14,154
median miles at test
2,828
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2007–2025

The FXSTBI's first-time pass rate has risen 11.4 points since 2007, 81.0% to 92.4%.

77%88%98%2007: 81.0% pass (84 tests)2008: 87.9% pass (157 tests)2009: 85.1% pass (221 tests)2010: 88.2% pass (204 tests)2011: 87.4% pass (182 tests)2012: 86.4% pass (169 tests)2013: 89.0% pass (173 tests)2014: 87.3% pass (165 tests)2015: 91.8% pass (170 tests)2016: 94.5% pass (163 tests)2017: 89.3% pass (169 tests)2018: 92.6% pass (121 tests)2019: 91.7% pass (132 tests)2020: 93.4% pass (106 tests)2021: 93.1% pass (145 tests)2022: 92.8% pass (139 tests)2023: 90.5% pass (137 tests)2024: 80.8% pass (99 tests)2025: 92.4% pass (92 tests)20072025

Pass rate by mileage

how the FXSTBI's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage FXSTBI passes first time 90.3% of the time; by 50k that's 92.7%.

85%89%94%0k: 90.3% pass (1,006 tests)10k: 89.1% pass (882 tests)20k: 89.5% pass (504 tests)30k: 86.1% pass (230 tests)40k: 86.8% pass (114 tests)50k: 92.7% pass (41 tests)0k30k50k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a FXSTBI

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
87 37 0.4×
brakes
36 15.3 0.2×
fuel and exhaust
23 9.8 1.0×
tyres and wheels
23 9.8 0.4×
lamps and reflectors
22 9.4 0.3×
reg plates and vin
19 8.1 1.0×
steering and suspension
8 3.4 0.1×
tyres
7 3 0.4×
Identification of the vehicle
5 2.1 0.8×
body and structure
5 2.1 0.3×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the FXSTBI beats 3 of its 4 closest rivals (HARLEY-DAVIDSON FLSTF, HARLEY-DAVIDSON FLSTC, HARLEY-DAVIDSON XL1200C).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the FXSTBI.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2004 (89.6% pass). Weakest: 2005 (89.3%).

89%89%90%2004: 89.6% pass (941 tests)2005: 89.3% pass (900 tests)2006: 89.5% pass (769 tests)200420052006

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

HARLEY-DAVIDSON FXSTBI FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the HARLEY-DAVIDSON FXSTBI reliable?

The HARLEY-DAVIDSON FXSTBI is more reliable than average for its class: 89.2% of its 2,828 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #1212 of 5426 models.

What does a FXSTBI fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 37% of all defects recorded against failed FXSTBI tests.

What is the best year of FXSTBI to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2004-registered examples do best (89.6%) and 2005 worst (89.3%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a FXSTBI last?

The median FXSTBI shows 14,154 miles at test, and examples around 50k miles still pass 92.7% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.