BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025
89.3%
first-time pass rate
4.4%
failed outright
6,609
median miles at test
6,915
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2017–2025

The FXSB's first-time pass rate has risen 5.5 points since 2017, 83.2% to 88.7%.

81%87%93%2017: 83.2% pass (399 tests)2018: 85.3% pass (634 tests)2019: 88.9% pass (855 tests)2020: 90.6% pass (702 tests)2021: 91.1% pass (935 tests)2022: 90.4% pass (920 tests)2023: 90.8% pass (925 tests)2024: 90.1% pass (687 tests)2025: 88.7% pass (745 tests)20172025

Pass rate by mileage

how the FXSB's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage FXSB passes first time 89.7% of the time; by 30k that's 84.8%.

84%87%91%0k: 89.7% pass (4,747 tests)10k: 88.7% pass (1,609 tests)20k: 88.6% pass (369 tests)30k: 84.8% pass (92 tests)0k20k30k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a FXSB

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lamps and reflectors
223 42.7 1.5×
Identification of the vehicle
71 13.6 4.4×
tyres
47 9 1.0×
brakes
46 8.8 0.1×
lighting and signalling
37 7.1 0.1×
reg plates and vin
32 6.1 0.5×
structure and attachments
31 5.9 0.6×
suspension
15 2.9 0.3×
steering and suspension
10 1.9
steering
10 1.9 0.3×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the FXSB beats 3 of its 4 closest rivals (HARLEY-DAVIDSON FLSTF, HARLEY-DAVIDSON FLSTC, HARLEY-DAVIDSON XL1200C).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the FXSB.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 1984 (96.6% pass). Weakest: 1985 (84.1%).

82%90%99%1984: 96.6% pass (58 tests)1985: 84.1% pass (69 tests)2013: 92.3% pass (196 tests)2014: 88.2% pass (2,350 tests)2015: 90.3% pass (2,465 tests)2016: 89.1% pass (1,580 tests)2017: 87.1% pass (62 tests)198420142017

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

HARLEY-DAVIDSON FXSB FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the HARLEY-DAVIDSON FXSB reliable?

The HARLEY-DAVIDSON FXSB is more reliable than average for its class: 89.3% of its 6,915 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #1180 of 5426 models.

What does a FXSB fail its MOT on most?

lamps and reflectors — 43% of all defects recorded against failed FXSB tests.

What is the best year of FXSB to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 1984-registered examples do best (96.6%) and 1985 worst (84.1%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a FXSB last?

The median FXSB shows 6,609 miles at test, and examples around 30k miles still pass 84.8% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.