BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025
87.6%
first-time pass rate
5.6%
failed outright
16,220
median miles at test
647
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2006–2022

The FXLR's first-time pass rate has fallen 6.2 points since 2006, 86.8% to 80.6%.

74%87%99%2006: 86.8% pass (38 tests)2007: 88.9% pass (36 tests)2008: 90.9% pass (33 tests)2009: 81.1% pass (37 tests)2010: 84.4% pass (32 tests)2011: 89.2% pass (37 tests)2012: 79.5% pass (39 tests)2013: 78.0% pass (41 tests)2014: 91.2% pass (34 tests)2015: 95.0% pass (40 tests)2016: 90.0% pass (40 tests)2017: 90.0% pass (30 tests)2019: 93.5% pass (31 tests)2021: 91.2% pass (34 tests)2022: 80.6% pass (31 tests)20062022

Pass rate by mileage

how the FXLR's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage FXLR passes first time 88.5% of the time; by 40k that's 85.4%.

84%87%89%0k: 88.5% pass (209 tests)10k: 85.8% pass (134 tests)20k: 84.9% pass (119 tests)30k: 86.8% pass (76 tests)40k: 85.4% pass (41 tests)0k20k40k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a FXLR

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
31 37.8 0.7×
brakes
23 28 0.6×
steering and suspension
10 12.2 0.3×
reg plates and vin
6 7.3 1.3×
lamps and reflectors
3 3.7 0.3×
tyres and wheels
3 3.7 0.2×
fuel and exhaust
2 2.4 0.4×
driving controls
2 2.4 1.3×
wheels
1 1.2 2.6×
tyres
1 1.2 0.2×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the FXLR beats 0 of its 4 closest rivals (HARLEY-DAVIDSON FLSTF, HARLEY-DAVIDSON FLSTC, HARLEY-DAVIDSON XL1200C).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the FXLR.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 1994 (92.2% pass). Weakest: 1993 (83.0%).

81%88%94%1987: 84.6% pass (52 tests)1989: 85.3% pass (68 tests)1990: 88.7% pass (106 tests)1991: 83.9% pass (56 tests)1993: 83.0% pass (112 tests)1994: 92.2% pass (102 tests)198719911994

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

HARLEY-DAVIDSON FXLR FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the HARLEY-DAVIDSON FXLR reliable?

The HARLEY-DAVIDSON FXLR is more reliable than average for its class: 87.6% of its 647 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #1722 of 5426 models.

What does a FXLR fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 38% of all defects recorded against failed FXLR tests.

What is the best year of FXLR to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 1994-registered examples do best (92.2%) and 1993 worst (83.0%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a FXLR last?

The median FXLR shows 16,220 miles at test, and examples around 40k miles still pass 85.4% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.