BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025
88.3%
first-time pass rate
4.8%
failed outright
11,938
median miles at test
7,851
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2011–2025

The FXDF's first-time pass rate has risen 4.1 points since 2011, 84.6% to 88.7%.

83%88%92%2011: 84.6% pass (246 tests)2012: 84.9% pass (418 tests)2013: 90.0% pass (551 tests)2014: 89.2% pass (649 tests)2015: 86.9% pass (687 tests)2016: 88.2% pass (663 tests)2017: 88.3% pass (656 tests)2018: 90.8% pass (477 tests)2019: 87.5% pass (503 tests)2020: 89.4% pass (405 tests)2021: 89.3% pass (560 tests)2022: 90.3% pass (566 tests)2023: 88.4% pass (571 tests)2024: 85.4% pass (437 tests)2025: 88.7% pass (434 tests)20112025

Pass rate by mileage

how the FXDF's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage FXDF passes first time 89.4% of the time; by 50k that's 79.7%.

78%85%91%0k: 89.4% pass (3,175 tests)10k: 87.3% pass (2,842 tests)20k: 88.5% pass (1,162 tests)30k: 89.4% pass (398 tests)40k: 85.4% pass (144 tests)50k: 79.7% pass (69 tests)0k30k50k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a FXDF

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
167 25.3 0.3×
lamps and reflectors
156 23.6 0.8×
brakes
103 15.6 0.2×
reg plates and vin
55 8.3 0.7×
steering and suspension
45 6.8 0.1×
suspension
32 4.8 0.5×
Identification of the vehicle
31 4.7 1.7×
structure and attachments
26 3.9 0.4×
fuel and exhaust
23 3.5 0.4×
tyres and wheels
22 3.3 0.1×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the FXDF beats 0 of its 4 closest rivals (HARLEY-DAVIDSON FLSTF, HARLEY-DAVIDSON FLSTC, HARLEY-DAVIDSON XL1200C).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the FXDF.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2009 (89.3% pass). Weakest: 2011 (86.4%).

86%88%90%2007: 87.2% pass (431 tests)2008: 88.9% pass (2,378 tests)2009: 89.3% pass (1,974 tests)2010: 87.8% pass (1,527 tests)2011: 86.4% pass (1,008 tests)2012: 87.8% pass (376 tests)200720102012

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

HARLEY-DAVIDSON FXDF FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the HARLEY-DAVIDSON FXDF reliable?

The HARLEY-DAVIDSON FXDF is more reliable than average for its class: 88.3% of its 7,851 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #1506 of 5426 models.

What does a FXDF fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 25% of all defects recorded against failed FXDF tests.

What is the best year of FXDF to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2009-registered examples do best (89.3%) and 2011 worst (86.4%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a FXDF last?

The median FXDF shows 11,938 miles at test, and examples around 50k miles still pass 79.7% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.