BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025
89.1%
first-time pass rate
5.1%
failed outright
7,138
median miles at test
2,733
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2011–2025

The FXCWC's first-time pass rate has risen 7.4 points since 2011, 85.0% to 92.4%.

82%89%96%2011: 85.0% pass (127 tests)2012: 87.7% pass (220 tests)2013: 83.9% pass (248 tests)2014: 88.5% pass (243 tests)2015: 91.5% pass (223 tests)2016: 85.1% pass (222 tests)2017: 89.9% pass (198 tests)2018: 90.4% pass (156 tests)2019: 87.4% pass (159 tests)2020: 90.0% pass (120 tests)2021: 93.5% pass (185 tests)2022: 89.8% pass (177 tests)2023: 91.9% pass (172 tests)2024: 92.0% pass (138 tests)2025: 92.4% pass (145 tests)20112025

Pass rate by mileage

how the FXCWC's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage FXCWC passes first time 89.6% of the time; by 30k that's 80.4%.

79%85%91%0k: 89.6% pass (1,819 tests)10k: 88.3% pass (643 tests)20k: 89.6% pass (164 tests)30k: 80.4% pass (51 tests)0k20k30k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a FXCWC

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
67 23.4 0.5×
reg plates and vin
57 19.9 2.3×
lamps and reflectors
45 15.7 0.6×
steering and suspension
27 9.4 0.3×
Identification of the vehicle
18 6.3 2.9×
brakes
18 6.3 0.1×
tyres and wheels
17 5.9 0.3×
fuel and exhaust
16 5.6 0.8×
tyres
13 4.5 0.6×
suspension
8 2.8 0.4×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the FXCWC beats 3 of its 4 closest rivals (HARLEY-DAVIDSON FLSTF, HARLEY-DAVIDSON FLSTC, HARLEY-DAVIDSON XL1200C).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the FXCWC.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2009 (89.6% pass). Weakest: 2010 (87.9%).

87%89%90%2008: 88.8% pass (1,378 tests)2009: 89.6% pass (1,057 tests)2010: 87.9% pass (239 tests)200820092010

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

HARLEY-DAVIDSON FXCWC FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the HARLEY-DAVIDSON FXCWC reliable?

The HARLEY-DAVIDSON FXCWC is more reliable than average for its class: 89.1% of its 2,733 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #1243 of 5426 models.

What does a FXCWC fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 23% of all defects recorded against failed FXCWC tests.

What is the best year of FXCWC to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2009-registered examples do best (89.6%) and 2010 worst (87.9%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a FXCWC last?

The median FXCWC shows 7,138 miles at test, and examples around 30k miles still pass 80.4% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.