BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025
89.9%
first-time pass rate
4.3%
failed outright
10,606
median miles at test
3,534
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2006–2025

The FLSTN's first-time pass rate has risen 4.1 points since 2006, 87.9% to 92.0%.

78%89%99%2006: 87.9% pass (66 tests)2007: 95.3% pass (64 tests)2008: 90.6% pass (64 tests)2009: 90.8% pass (65 tests)2010: 84.4% pass (135 tests)2011: 91.3% pass (150 tests)2012: 81.7% pass (142 tests)2013: 85.6% pass (160 tests)2014: 86.8% pass (167 tests)2015: 90.1% pass (181 tests)2016: 85.5% pass (186 tests)2017: 86.3% pass (219 tests)2018: 93.4% pass (226 tests)2019: 93.8% pass (210 tests)2020: 92.0% pass (212 tests)2021: 91.3% pass (276 tests)2022: 89.8% pass (285 tests)2023: 92.2% pass (270 tests)2024: 92.7% pass (220 tests)2025: 92.0% pass (225 tests)20062025

Pass rate by mileage

how the FLSTN's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage FLSTN passes first time 90.8% of the time; by 40k that's 89.2%.

82%87%92%0k: 90.8% pass (1,650 tests)10k: 89.4% pass (1,151 tests)20k: 90.6% pass (416 tests)30k: 83.5% pass (176 tests)40k: 89.2% pass (65 tests)0k20k40k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a FLSTN

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
58 23 0.3×
reg plates and vin
42 16.7 1.2×
lamps and reflectors
35 13.9 0.5×
brakes
29 11.5 0.2×
tyres and wheels
20 7.9 0.3×
tyres
19 7.5 0.7×
Identification of the vehicle
17 6.7 2.1×
fuel and exhaust
13 5.2 0.4×
steering and suspension
11 4.4 0.1×
suspension
8 3.2 0.3×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the FLSTN beats 4 of its 4 closest rivals (HARLEY-DAVIDSON FLSTF, HARLEY-DAVIDSON FLSTC, HARLEY-DAVIDSON XL1200C).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the FLSTN.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2011 (93.7% pass). Weakest: 2005 (78.3%).

75%86%97%1993: 84.0% pass (50 tests)1994: 88.9% pass (243 tests)1995: 90.4% pass (293 tests)1996: 90.2% pass (264 tests)2005: 78.3% pass (60 tests)2006: 87.7% pass (285 tests)2007: 86.5% pass (630 tests)2008: 91.7% pass (301 tests)2010: 91.7% pass (84 tests)2011: 93.7% pass (158 tests)2012: 90.9% pass (132 tests)2014: 93.6% pass (267 tests)2015: 92.8% pass (305 tests)2016: 91.0% pass (156 tests)2017: 91.2% pass (57 tests)199320082017

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

HARLEY-DAVIDSON FLSTN FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the HARLEY-DAVIDSON FLSTN reliable?

The HARLEY-DAVIDSON FLSTN is more reliable than average for its class: 89.9% of its 3,534 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #988 of 5426 models.

What does a FLSTN fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 23% of all defects recorded against failed FLSTN tests.

What is the best year of FLSTN to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2011-registered examples do best (93.7%) and 2005 worst (78.3%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a FLSTN last?

The median FLSTN shows 10,606 miles at test, and examples around 40k miles still pass 89.2% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.