BIKERELIABILITY Reg check
Model report · 2005–2025
88.9%
first-time pass rate
4.9%
failed outright
14,959
median miles at test
4,331
MOT tests, 2005–2025
+4.3pp
vs expected · age & mileage

The pass rate is the MOT first-time pass: a roadworthiness check of the items an MOT covers (brakes, lights, tyres, steering, structure, emissions), not a full mechanical inspection of engine or gearbox internals. It is a reliability signal, not a complete measure of mechanical reliability. What this measures.

“vs expected” adjusts for age, mileage and test class, so a cherished classic and a hard-used commuter are compared fairly. How this works.

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2006–2025

The FAT BOY's first-time pass rate has fallen 9.6 points since 2006, 97.1% to 87.5%.

82%91%100%2006: 97.1% pass (170 tests)2007: 91.6% pass (179 tests)2008: 87.4% pass (175 tests)2009: 87.6% pass (185 tests)2010: 90.2% pass (183 tests)2011: 85.3% pass (190 tests)2012: 89.4% pass (189 tests)2013: 85.3% pass (217 tests)2014: 87.4% pass (231 tests)2015: 92.3% pass (234 tests)2016: 87.4% pass (231 tests)2017: 86.2% pass (253 tests)2018: 90.0% pass (240 tests)2019: 88.8% pass (232 tests)2020: 89.0% pass (182 tests)2021: 91.0% pass (266 tests)2022: 87.1% pass (272 tests)2023: 90.5% pass (263 tests)2024: 86.9% pass (191 tests)2025: 87.5% pass (224 tests)20062025

Pass rate by mileage

how the FAT BOY's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage FAT BOY passes first time 89.7% of the time; by 50k that's 85.7%.

85%88%91%0k: 89.7% pass (1,344 tests)10k: 87.8% pass (1,339 tests)20k: 89.9% pass (763 tests)30k: 89.1% pass (396 tests)40k: 89.1% pass (221 tests)50k: 85.7% pass (105 tests)0k30k50k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a FAT BOY

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
124 28.8 0.4×
lamps and reflectors
80 18.6 0.8×
brakes
67 15.6 0.3×
reg plates and vin
44 10.2 1.2×
tyres and wheels
24 5.6 0.3×
steering and suspension
21 4.9 0.1×
structure and attachments
20 4.7 0.6×
Identification of the vehicle
18 4.2 1.7×
fuel and exhaust
18 4.2 0.5×
tyres
14 3.3 0.4×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the FAT BOY beats 2 of its 4 closest rivals (HARLEY-DAVIDSON FLSTF, HARLEY-DAVIDSON FLSTC, HARLEY-DAVIDSON XL1200C).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the FAT BOY.

Compare with any bike

rival not listed above? pick any model to see it head-to-head with the Fat Boy

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2010 (93.1% pass). Weakest: 2008 (78.9%).

76%86%96%1971: 89.4% pass (94 tests)1990: 88.9% pass (144 tests)1991: 89.2% pass (148 tests)1992: 89.9% pass (337 tests)1993: 88.0% pass (275 tests)1994: 92.3% pass (183 tests)1995: 90.9% pass (318 tests)1996: 88.1% pass (445 tests)1997: 88.3% pass (334 tests)1998: 89.2% pass (158 tests)1999: 91.8% pass (97 tests)2000: 86.5% pass (208 tests)2001: 83.2% pass (149 tests)2002: 88.3% pass (94 tests)2003: 92.7% pass (96 tests)2004: 88.6% pass (88 tests)2005: 92.0% pass (87 tests)2006: 87.8% pass (90 tests)2007: 87.5% pass (56 tests)2008: 78.9% pass (57 tests)2009: 82.8% pass (99 tests)2010: 93.1% pass (130 tests)2011: 80.7% pass (119 tests)2012: 90.7% pass (54 tests)2013: 92.6% pass (94 tests)2014: 91.3% pass (196 tests)197120022014

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

HARLEY-DAVIDSON FAT BOY FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the HARLEY-DAVIDSON FAT BOY reliable?

The HARLEY-DAVIDSON FAT BOY is more reliable than average for its class: 88.9% of its 4,331 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #1305 of 5428 models.

What does a FAT BOY fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 29% of all defects recorded against failed FAT BOY tests.

What is the best year of FAT BOY to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2010-registered examples do best (93.1%) and 2008 worst (78.9%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a FAT BOY last?

The median FAT BOY shows 14,959 miles at test, and examples around 50k miles still pass 85.7% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.

Embed this bike

Free to embed on your site, blog or forum — a live Harley-Davidson Fat Boy reliability card that stays up to date and links back here. More on the free API page.