BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025
87.5%
first-time pass rate
6.2%
failed outright
9,358
median miles at test
3,762
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2016–2025

The FAT BOB's first-time pass rate has risen 5.0 points since 2016, 84.4% to 89.4%.

83%88%94%2016: 84.4% pass (45 tests)2017: 86.2% pass (275 tests)2018: 88.1% pass (329 tests)2019: 86.7% pass (443 tests)2020: 91.8% pass (392 tests)2021: 85.7% pass (477 tests)2022: 88.9% pass (469 tests)2023: 86.1% pass (489 tests)2024: 85.2% pass (364 tests)2025: 89.4% pass (386 tests)20162025

Pass rate by mileage

how the FAT BOB's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage FAT BOB passes first time 88.9% of the time; by 40k that's 87.9%.

78%84%91%0k: 88.9% pass (2,005 tests)10k: 87.0% pass (1,229 tests)20k: 83.7% pass (367 tests)30k: 79.8% pass (99 tests)40k: 87.9% pass (33 tests)0k20k40k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a FAT BOB

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lamps and reflectors
168 45.8 2.3×
brakes
49 13.4 0.3×
tyres
26 7.1 0.9×
Identification of the vehicle
26 7.1 3.0×
suspension
24 6.5 0.8×
lighting and signalling
23 6.3 0.1×
structure and attachments
23 6.3 0.7×
steering
17 4.6 0.9×
audible warning (Horn)
6 1.6 0.9×
reg plates and vin
5 1.4 0.2×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the FAT BOB beats 0 of its 4 closest rivals (HARLEY-DAVIDSON FLSTF, HARLEY-DAVIDSON FLSTC, HARLEY-DAVIDSON XL1200C).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the FAT BOB.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2016 (89.6% pass). Weakest: 2011 (80.2%).

78%85%91%2009: 82.6% pass (86 tests)2010: 86.2% pass (65 tests)2011: 80.2% pass (91 tests)2013: 88.5% pass (296 tests)2014: 87.5% pass (1,441 tests)2015: 87.1% pass (1,143 tests)2016: 89.6% pass (481 tests)200920132016

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

HARLEY-DAVIDSON FAT BOB FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the HARLEY-DAVIDSON FAT BOB reliable?

The HARLEY-DAVIDSON FAT BOB is more reliable than average for its class: 87.5% of its 3,762 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #1748 of 5426 models.

What does a FAT BOB fail its MOT on most?

lamps and reflectors — 46% of all defects recorded against failed FAT BOB tests.

What is the best year of FAT BOB to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2016-registered examples do best (89.6%) and 2011 worst (80.2%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a FAT BOB last?

The median FAT BOB shows 9,358 miles at test, and examples around 40k miles still pass 87.9% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.