The pass rate is the MOT first-time pass: a roadworthiness check of the items an MOT covers (brakes, lights, tyres, steering, structure, emissions), not a full mechanical inspection of engine or gearbox internals. It is a reliability signal, not a complete measure of mechanical reliability. What this measures.
“vs expected” adjusts for age, mileage and test class, so a cherished classic and a hard-used commuter are compared fairly. How this works.
Pass rate over time
The HUSSAR JR 50's first-time pass rate has risen 1.7 points since 2006, 66.7% to 68.4%.
What fails on a HUSSAR JR 50
| Component group | Share of defects | Defects | % of defects |
|---|---|---|---|
| lighting and signalling |
|
115 | 33.1 |
| brakes |
|
79 | 22.8 |
| steering and suspension |
|
60 | 17.3 |
| tyres and wheels |
|
45 | 13 |
| fuel and exhaust |
|
18 | 5.2 |
| body and structure |
|
13 | 3.7 |
| Items Not Tested |
|
5 | 1.4 |
| lamps and reflectors |
|
5 | 1.4 |
| suspension |
|
4 | 1.2 |
| reg plates and vin |
|
3 | 0.9 |
Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects.
How rivals compare
On first-time pass rate the HUSSAR JR 50 beats 1 of its 4 closest rivals (PEUGEOT SPEEDFIGHT, PIAGGIO ZIP, PIAGGIO NRG).
Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the HUSSAR JR 50.
Compare with any bike
More CPI models
Pass rate by registration year
Best year to buy used: 2004 (67.8% pass). Weakest: 2005 (60.6%).
First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.
Embed this bike
Free to embed on your site, blog or forum — a live Cpi Hussar JR 50 reliability card that stays up to date and links back here. More on the free API page.