Data as of: DVSA MOT results to 2025
Victory Hammer 1731 vs Yamaha XJR1300
The Victory Hammer 1731 passes its MOT first time more often than the Yamaha XJR1300: 91.5% vs 87.4%, a 4.1-point lead.
MOT reliability, side by side
| Metric | Victory Hammer 1731 | Yamaha XJR1300 |
|---|---|---|
| First-time pass rate | 91.5% | 87.4% |
| Outright fail rate | 3.4% | 5.6% |
| Vs comparable bikes (age & mileage adjusted) | +5.2 pts | +2.8 pts |
| Engine size | 1,731cc | 1,250cc |
| Median miles at test | 11,793 | 16,186 |
| MOT tests analysed | 118 | 95,093 |
| Most common failure | tyres and wheels | brakes |
First-time outcomes on normal tests, 2005–2025. "Most common failure" is the component group with the most recorded defects on failed tests. Read pass rates against test counts: a smaller sample is noisier. Source: DVSA anonymised MOT results.
"Vs comparable bikes" is the first-time pass rate minus the rate expected for each bike's own mix of age, mileage and test class, in percentage points: positive means better than comparable bikes. How this works.
Pass rate by mileage
| Mileage | Victory Hammer 1731 | Yamaha XJR1300 |
|---|---|---|
| 0k-10k miles | 89.8% | 90.8% |
| 10k-20k miles | 94.1% | 87.9% |
Bands with fewer than 30 tests for either bike are left out.
See each bike's full report (trend, mileage curve, failure breakdown and rivals) on its own page.