Data as of: DVSA MOT results to 2025
Triumph Tiger 1200 GT Pro vs Triumph Tiger
The Triumph Tiger 1200 GT Pro passes its MOT first time more often than the Triumph Tiger: 95.9% vs 89.6%, a 6.3-point lead.
MOT reliability, side by side
| Metric | Triumph Tiger 1200 GT Pro | Triumph Tiger |
|---|---|---|
| First-time pass rate | 95.9% | 89.6% |
| Outright fail rate | 2.4% | 6.1% |
| Vs comparable bikes (age & mileage adjusted) | +7.8 pts | +4.5 pts |
| Engine size | 1,160cc | 955cc |
| Rank among all models | #28 of 5428 | #1077 of 5428 |
| Median miles at test | 8,422 | 16,462 |
| MOT tests analysed | 295 | 161,363 |
| Most common failure | tyres | brakes |
First-time outcomes on normal tests, 2005–2025. "Most common failure" is the component group with the most recorded defects on failed tests. Read pass rates against test counts: a smaller sample is noisier. Source: DVSA anonymised MOT results.
"Vs comparable bikes" is the first-time pass rate minus the rate expected for each bike's own mix of age, mileage and test class, in percentage points: positive means better than comparable bikes. How this works.
Pass rate by mileage
| Mileage | Triumph Tiger 1200 GT Pro | Triumph Tiger |
|---|---|---|
| 0k-10k miles | 96.6% | 93.4% |
| 10k-20k miles | 96.9% | 90.9% |
Bands with fewer than 30 tests for either bike are left out.
See each bike's full report (trend, mileage curve, failure breakdown and rivals) on its own page.