Data as of: DVSA MOT results to 2025
Sukida SK 125 T-21 vs Gilera Runner
The Gilera Runner passes its MOT first time more often than the Sukida SK 125 T-21: 70.8% vs 63.7%, a 7.1-point lead.
MOT reliability, side by side
| Metric | Sukida SK 125 T-21 | Gilera Runner |
|---|---|---|
| First-time pass rate | 63.7% | 70.8% |
| Outright fail rate | 30.5% | 21.5% |
| Vs comparable bikes (age & mileage adjusted) | -9.3 pts | -0.7 pts |
| Engine size | 125cc | 124cc |
| Median miles at test | 6,246 | 11,381 |
| MOT tests analysed | 190 | 69,850 |
| Most common failure | lighting and signalling | lighting and signalling |
First-time outcomes on normal tests, 2005–2025. "Most common failure" is the component group with the most recorded defects on failed tests. Read pass rates against test counts: a smaller sample is noisier. Source: DVSA anonymised MOT results.
"Vs comparable bikes" is the first-time pass rate minus the rate expected for each bike's own mix of age, mileage and test class, in percentage points: positive means better than comparable bikes. How this works.
Pass rate by test year
| Test year | Sukida SK 125 T-21 | Gilera Runner |
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 61.5% | 67.6% |
| 2012 | 69.4% | 69.5% |
| 2013 | 64.7% | 69.5% |
Each year mixes bikes of different ages, so a fleet that is getting older tends to slip.
Pass rate by mileage
| Mileage | Sukida SK 125 T-21 | Gilera Runner |
|---|---|---|
| 0k-10k miles | 67.4% | 76.2% |
| 10k-20k miles | 58.1% | 67.5% |
Bands with fewer than 30 tests for either bike are left out.
See each bike's full report (trend, mileage curve, failure breakdown and rivals) on its own page.