Head-to-head · 2005–2025
Data as of: DVSA MOT results to 2025
Royal Enfield Crusader Sports vs Honda XR250
The Royal Enfield Crusader Sports passes its MOT first time more often than the Honda XR250: 88.3% vs 78.8%, a 9.5-point lead.
MOT reliability, side by side
first-time pass rate, outright fail rate and tests analysed · 2005–2025
| Metric | Royal Enfield Crusader Sports | Honda XR250 |
|---|---|---|
| First-time pass rate | 88.3% | 78.8% |
| Outright fail rate | 4.5% | 12.3% |
| Engine size | 250cc | 249cc |
| Rank among all models | #1505 of 5428 | #3805 of 5428 |
| Median miles at test | 17,607 | 8,618 |
| MOT tests analysed | 223 | 9,277 |
| Most common failure | lighting and signalling | lighting and signalling |
First-time outcomes on normal tests, 2005–2025. "Most common failure" is the component group with the most recorded defects on failed tests. Read pass rates against test counts: a smaller sample is noisier. Source: DVSA anonymised MOT results.
Pass rate by mileage
first-time MOT pass rate by miles on the clock at test
| Mileage | Royal Enfield Crusader Sports | Honda XR250 |
|---|---|---|
| 0k-10k miles | 91.4% | 79.5% |
| 10k-20k miles | 97.1% | 78.9% |
| 20k-30k miles | 80.0% | 78.3% |
Bands with fewer than 30 tests for either bike are left out.
See each bike's full report (trend, mileage curve, failure breakdown and rivals) on its own page.