BIKERELIABILITY Reg check
League table/ Norton 50/vs Suzuki AN400
Head-to-head · 2005–2025

Data as of: DVSA MOT results to 2025

Norton 50 vs Suzuki AN400

The Norton 50 passes its MOT first time more often than the Suzuki AN400: 91.5% vs 86.2%, a 5.3-point lead.

MOT reliability, side by side

first-time pass rate, outright fail rate and tests analysed · 2005–2025
Metric Norton 50 Suzuki AN400
First-time pass rate 91.5% 86.2%
Outright fail rate 0.8% 9.8%
Engine size 350cc 385cc
Rank among all models #567 of 5428 #2148 of 5428
Median miles at test 19,595 15,861
MOT tests analysed 365 27,056
Most common failure lighting and signalling brakes

First-time outcomes on normal tests, 2005–2025. "Most common failure" is the component group with the most recorded defects on failed tests. Read pass rates against test counts: a smaller sample is noisier. Source: DVSA anonymised MOT results.

Pass rate by test year

first-time MOT pass rate in each calendar year both bikes were tested
Test year Norton 50 Suzuki AN400
2006 95.0% 91.0%
2007 90.7% 88.6%
2008 91.9% 87.6%
2009 90.3% 87.0%
2011 86.8% 84.6%

Each year mixes bikes of different ages, so a fleet that is getting older tends to slip.

Pass rate by mileage

first-time MOT pass rate by miles on the clock at test
Mileage Norton 50 Suzuki AN400
0k-10k miles 85.7% 91.7%
10k-20k miles 95.1% 86.7%
20k-30k miles 90.6% 82.7%
30k-40k miles 97.7% 81.0%

Bands with fewer than 30 tests for either bike are left out.

See each bike's full report (trend, mileage curve, failure breakdown and rivals) on its own page.