Data as of: DVSA MOT results to 2025
MZ ETZ300 vs Yamaha RD350
The Yamaha RD350 passes its MOT first time more often than the MZ ETZ300: 86.3% vs 85.9%, a 0.4-point lead.
MOT reliability, side by side
| Metric | MZ ETZ300 | Yamaha RD350 |
|---|---|---|
| First-time pass rate | 85.9% | 86.3% |
| Outright fail rate | 5.3% | 6.6% |
| Vs comparable bikes (age & mileage adjusted) | +3.0 pts | +2.4 pts |
| Engine size | 291cc | 347cc |
| Rank among all models | #2232 of 5428 | #2120 of 5428 |
| Median miles at test | 26,569 | 23,256 |
| MOT tests analysed | 304 | 19,574 |
| Most common failure | lighting and signalling | lighting and signalling |
First-time outcomes on normal tests, 2005–2025. "Most common failure" is the component group with the most recorded defects on failed tests. Read pass rates against test counts: a smaller sample is noisier. Source: DVSA anonymised MOT results.
"Vs comparable bikes" is the first-time pass rate minus the rate expected for each bike's own mix of age, mileage and test class, in percentage points: positive means better than comparable bikes. How this works.
Pass rate by mileage
| Mileage | MZ ETZ300 | Yamaha RD350 |
|---|---|---|
| 0k-10k miles | 91.9% | 88.9% |
| 10k-20k miles | 89.8% | 87.5% |
| 20k-30k miles | 86.7% | 85.5% |
| 30k-40k miles | 80.4% | 85.3% |
Bands with fewer than 30 tests for either bike are left out.
See each bike's full report (trend, mileage curve, failure breakdown and rivals) on its own page.