Data as of: DVSA MOT results to 2025
Hyosung GT 250 Comet vs Honda XR250
The Honda XR250 passes its MOT first time more often than the Hyosung GT 250 Comet: 78.8% vs 76.6%, a 2.2-point lead.
MOT reliability, side by side
| Metric | Hyosung GT 250 Comet | Honda XR250 |
|---|---|---|
| First-time pass rate | 76.6% | 78.8% |
| Outright fail rate | 16.1% | 12.3% |
| Vs comparable bikes (age & mileage adjusted) | -9.6 pts | -6.8 pts |
| Engine size | 249cc | 249cc |
| Rank among all models | #4109 of 5428 | #3805 of 5428 |
| Median miles at test | 13,068 | 8,618 |
| MOT tests analysed | 218 | 9,277 |
| Most common failure | lighting and signalling | lighting and signalling |
First-time outcomes on normal tests, 2005–2025. "Most common failure" is the component group with the most recorded defects on failed tests. Read pass rates against test counts: a smaller sample is noisier. Source: DVSA anonymised MOT results.
"Vs comparable bikes" is the first-time pass rate minus the rate expected for each bike's own mix of age, mileage and test class, in percentage points: positive means better than comparable bikes. How this works.
Pass rate by mileage
| Mileage | Hyosung GT 250 Comet | Honda XR250 |
|---|---|---|
| 0k-10k miles | 77.9% | 79.5% |
| 10k-20k miles | 76.5% | 78.9% |
| 20k-30k miles | 73.7% | 78.3% |
Bands with fewer than 30 tests for either bike are left out.
See each bike's full report (trend, mileage curve, failure breakdown and rivals) on its own page.