Gilera Nexus 300 vs Yamaha WR250F

The Gilera Nexus 300 passes its MOT first time more often than the Yamaha WR250F: 79.4% vs 78.0%, a 1.4-point lead.

MOT reliability, side by side

first-time pass rate, outright fail rate and tests analysed · 2005–2025

Metric	Gilera Nexus 300	Yamaha WR250F
First-time pass rate	79.4%	78.0%
Outright fail rate	10.8%	12.8%
Vs comparable bikes (age & mileage adjusted)	-7.4 pts	-10.7 pts
Engine size	278cc	249cc
Rank among all models	#3705 of 5428	#3913 of 5428
Median miles at test	11,667	3,018
MOT tests analysed	296	10,465
Most common failure	steering and suspension	lighting and signalling

First-time outcomes on normal tests, 2005–2025. "Most common failure" is the component group with the most recorded defects on failed tests. Read pass rates against test counts: a smaller sample is noisier. Source: DVSA anonymised MOT results.

"Vs comparable bikes" is the first-time pass rate minus the rate expected for each bike's own mix of age, mileage and test class, in percentage points: positive means better than comparable bikes. How this works.

Pass rate by test year

first-time MOT pass rate in each calendar year both bikes were tested

Test year	Gilera Nexus 300	Yamaha WR250F
2013	84.4%	75.7%
2014	80.0%	77.9%
2015	97.0%	77.3%
2016	70.6%	78.9%

Each year mixes bikes of different ages, so a fleet that is getting older tends to slip.

Pass rate by mileage

first-time MOT pass rate by miles on the clock at test

Mileage	Gilera Nexus 300	Yamaha WR250F
0k-10k miles	78.6%	78.1%
10k-20k miles	81.3%	77.3%
20k-30k miles	75.5%	67.9%

Bands with fewer than 30 tests for either bike are left out.

GILERA NEXUS 300 79.4% pass · 296 tests YAMAHA WR250F 78.0% pass · 10.5k tests

See each bike's full report (trend, mileage curve, failure breakdown and rivals) on its own page.