Data as of: DVSA MOT results to 2025
Cagiva Elephant vs BMW R1200
The BMW R1200 passes its MOT first time more often than the Cagiva Elephant: 92.9% vs 85.4%, a 7.5-point lead.
MOT reliability, side by side
| Metric | Cagiva Elephant | BMW R1200 |
|---|---|---|
| First-time pass rate | 85.4% | 92.9% |
| Outright fail rate | 7.9% | 3.7% |
| Vs comparable bikes (age & mileage adjusted) | +3.9 pts | +8.6 pts |
| Engine size | 900cc | 1,170cc |
| Median miles at test | 33,938 | 20,069 |
| MOT tests analysed | 178 | 299,381 |
| Most common failure | lighting and signalling | brakes |
First-time outcomes on normal tests, 2005–2025. "Most common failure" is the component group with the most recorded defects on failed tests. Read pass rates against test counts: a smaller sample is noisier. Source: DVSA anonymised MOT results.
"Vs comparable bikes" is the first-time pass rate minus the rate expected for each bike's own mix of age, mileage and test class, in percentage points: positive means better than comparable bikes. How this works.
Pass rate by mileage
| Mileage | Cagiva Elephant | BMW R1200 |
|---|---|---|
| 20k-30k miles | 78.0% | 92.8% |
| 40k-50k miles | 87.1% | 90.8% |
Bands with fewer than 30 tests for either bike are left out.
See each bike's full report (trend, mileage curve, failure breakdown and rivals) on its own page.