BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025

TRIUMPH CUB

199cc Petrol Class 1
91.3%
first-time pass rate
2.1%
failed outright
7,325
median miles at test
828
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2006–2017

The CUB's first-time pass rate has risen 5.1 points since 2006, 91.1% to 96.2%.

83%91%99%2006: 91.1% pass (56 tests)2007: 92.5% pass (53 tests)2008: 90.3% pass (62 tests)2009: 89.5% pass (76 tests)2010: 91.9% pass (74 tests)2011: 90.4% pass (73 tests)2012: 89.2% pass (65 tests)2013: 93.2% pass (73 tests)2014: 90.1% pass (71 tests)2015: 93.1% pass (72 tests)2016: 85.9% pass (64 tests)2017: 96.2% pass (52 tests)20062017

Pass rate by mileage

how the CUB's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 73.4%

A low-mileage CUB passes first time 90.3% of the time; by 20k that's 93.5%.

90%92%94%0k: 90.3% pass (400 tests)10k: 92.9% pass (140 tests)20k: 93.5% pass (107 tests)0k10k20k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a CUB

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
steering and suspension
18 42.9 0.3×
brakes
8 19 0.2×
lighting and signalling
6 14.3 0.2×
tyres and wheels
5 11.9 0.2×
driving controls
2 4.8 1.0×
fuel and exhaust
1 2.4 0.2×
drive system
1 2.4 0.2×
body and structure
1 2.4 0.3×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the CUB beats 4 of its 4 closest rivals (YAMAHA YP250, YAMAHA WR250F, HONDA XR250).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the CUB.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 1964 (100.0% pass). Weakest: 1960 (83.0%).

80%90%100%1960: 83.0% pass (94 tests)1961: 90.6% pass (139 tests)1962: 94.6% pass (74 tests)1963: 91.2% pass (57 tests)1964: 100.0% pass (78 tests)1965: 89.6% pass (67 tests)1966: 87.3% pass (55 tests)1967: 96.2% pass (52 tests)196019641967

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

TRIUMPH CUB FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the TRIUMPH CUB reliable?

The TRIUMPH CUB is more reliable than average for its class: 91.3% of its 828 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 73.4%. That ranks it #618 of 5426 models.

What does a CUB fail its MOT on most?

steering and suspension — 43% of all defects recorded against failed CUB tests.

What is the best year of CUB to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 1964-registered examples do best (100.0%) and 1960 worst (83.0%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a CUB last?

The median CUB shows 7,325 miles at test, and examples around 20k miles still pass 93.5% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.