BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025

SUZUKI TU250X

249cc Petrol Class 2
83.1%
first-time pass rate
8.8%
failed outright
13,174
median miles at test
3,107
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2005–2025

The TU250X's first-time pass rate has risen 4.4 points since 2005, 85.7% to 90.1%.

70%83%95%2005: 85.7% pass (42 tests)2006: 85.3% pass (224 tests)2007: 85.6% pass (216 tests)2008: 82.1% pass (195 tests)2009: 77.5% pass (204 tests)2010: 83.0% pass (188 tests)2011: 74.0% pass (204 tests)2012: 81.1% pass (180 tests)2013: 83.4% pass (181 tests)2014: 78.7% pass (178 tests)2015: 82.9% pass (170 tests)2016: 76.3% pass (156 tests)2017: 82.7% pass (150 tests)2018: 83.5% pass (97 tests)2019: 86.6% pass (97 tests)2020: 87.8% pass (98 tests)2021: 91.0% pass (122 tests)2022: 90.2% pass (123 tests)2023: 87.4% pass (111 tests)2024: 88.8% pass (80 tests)2025: 90.1% pass (91 tests)20052025

Pass rate by mileage

how the TU250X's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage TU250X passes first time 88.6% of the time; by 40k that's 73.1%.

70%81%92%0k: 88.6% pass (1,095 tests)10k: 83.4% pass (1,138 tests)20k: 76.1% pass (552 tests)30k: 76.3% pass (207 tests)40k: 73.1% pass (78 tests)0k20k40k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a TU250X

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
brakes
146 24.9 0.8×
lighting and signalling
119 20.3 0.7×
drive system
80 13.6 2.1×
steering and suspension
75 12.8 0.7×
tyres and wheels
45 7.7 0.6×
lamps and reflectors
42 7.2 0.5×
fuel and exhaust
29 4.9 1.1×
structure and attachments
24 4.1 0.6×
suspension
14 2.4 0.5×
driving controls
13 2.2 1.8×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the TU250X beats 3 of its 4 closest rivals (YAMAHA YP250, YAMAHA WR250F, HONDA XR250).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the TU250X.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2000 (86.3% pass). Weakest: 1997 (80.3%).

79%83%88%1997: 80.3% pass (801 tests)1998: 82.7% pass (1,116 tests)1999: 85.2% pass (683 tests)2000: 86.3% pass (388 tests)199719992000

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

SUZUKI TU250X FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the SUZUKI TU250X reliable?

The SUZUKI TU250X is about average for its class: 83.1% of its 3,107 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #2940 of 5426 models.

What does a TU250X fail its MOT on most?

brakes — 25% of all defects recorded against failed TU250X tests.

What is the best year of TU250X to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2000-registered examples do best (86.3%) and 1997 worst (80.3%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a TU250X last?

The median TU250X shows 13,174 miles at test, and examples around 40k miles still pass 73.1% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.