BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025

SUZUKI RG250

247cc Petrol Class 2
82.7%
first-time pass rate
10.4%
failed outright
19,868
median miles at test
1,055
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2006–2025

The RG250's first-time pass rate has risen 8.0 points since 2006, 75.3% to 83.3%.

62%81%100%2006: 75.3% pass (89 tests)2007: 68.2% pass (66 tests)2008: 74.6% pass (59 tests)2009: 76.9% pass (52 tests)2010: 82.5% pass (57 tests)2011: 85.7% pass (49 tests)2012: 85.4% pass (41 tests)2013: 82.0% pass (50 tests)2014: 91.1% pass (56 tests)2015: 82.7% pass (52 tests)2016: 87.3% pass (55 tests)2017: 81.4% pass (43 tests)2018: 78.1% pass (32 tests)2019: 94.0% pass (50 tests)2020: 94.9% pass (39 tests)2021: 87.5% pass (64 tests)2022: 83.6% pass (55 tests)2023: 90.4% pass (52 tests)2024: 89.5% pass (38 tests)2025: 83.3% pass (42 tests)20062025

Pass rate by mileage

how the RG250's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage RG250 passes first time 91.7% of the time; by 30k that's 81.7%.

78%86%94%0k: 91.7% pass (228 tests)10k: 80.7% pass (295 tests)20k: 80.5% pass (261 tests)30k: 81.7% pass (229 tests)0k20k30k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a RG250

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
96 32.3 1.1×
brakes
77 25.9 1.2×
steering and suspension
46 15.5 0.9×
tyres and wheels
19 6.4 0.7×
drive system
13 4.4 1.2×
body and structure
12 4 1.4×
suspension
10 3.4 1.0×
lamps and reflectors
10 3.4 0.4×
fuel and exhaust
7 2.4 0.9×
reg plates and vin
7 2.4 1.0×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the RG250 beats 3 of its 4 closest rivals (YAMAHA YP250, YAMAHA WR250F, HONDA XR250).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the RG250.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 1983 (90.4% pass). Weakest: 1990 (76.2%).

73%83%93%1983: 90.4% pass (52 tests)1984: 83.3% pass (102 tests)1985: 87.9% pass (140 tests)1986: 81.4% pass (199 tests)1987: 77.9% pass (136 tests)1988: 76.9% pass (104 tests)1989: 89.1% pass (64 tests)1990: 76.2% pass (63 tests)198319871990

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

SUZUKI RG250 FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the SUZUKI RG250 reliable?

The SUZUKI RG250 is less reliable than average for its class: 82.7% of its 1,055 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #3028 of 5426 models.

What does a RG250 fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 32% of all defects recorded against failed RG250 tests.

What is the best year of RG250 to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 1983-registered examples do best (90.4%) and 1990 worst (76.2%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a RG250 last?

The median RG250 shows 19,868 miles at test, and examples around 30k miles still pass 81.7% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.